Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
About
In The Last Decade
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
3.5k papers receiving 75.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies.
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies more than expected).
- Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe (2012)
- Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015 (2016)
- ‘Volunteer Humanitarianism’: volunteers and humanitarian aid in the Jungle refugee camp of Calais (2017)
- Containment through mobility: migrants’ spatial disobediences and the reshaping of control through the hotspot system (2017)
- The Making of Policies: Immigration and Immigrants in Italy (2006)
- Seeking refuge in Europe: spaces of transit and the violence of migration management (2018)
- Still ‘migrants’ after all those years: foundational mobilities, temporal frames and emplacement of migrants (2016)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.