Kate Hughes
- Strategy and Management top 0.5%
- Marketing top 0.5%
- Accounting top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Theodore E. ChristensenLesley WhiteRonald J. DaigleDavid HayesAlana ThomsonStephen FrawleyArianne ReisWilliam G. Heninger
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers)Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers)Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAccounting Organizations and SocietySustainability
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Hughes
21 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Strategy and Management 1.6k
- Marketing 1.2k
- Accounting 644
- Economics and Econometrics 288
- Sociology and Political Science 110
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Hughes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Hughes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Hughes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Hughes. The network helps show where Kate Hughes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Hughes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Hughes. Kate Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 62 | |
| 5 | Sibbaldia : The Journal of Botanic Garden horticulture | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Disaster risk management: ICT based approach | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 281 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Kate Hughes
Kate Hughes is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (1.2k citations), Strategy and Management (1.6k citations) and Accounting (644 citations). Kate Hughes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Theodore E. Christensen, Lesley White, Ronald J. Daigle, David Hayes, Alana Thomson, Stephen Frawley, Arianne Reis, William G. Heninger, Dan S. Dhaliwal and Linda Smith Bamber. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Accounting Organizations and Society and Sustainability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.