David Crepaz‐Keay
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Scott WeichKamaldeep BhuiEva CyhlarovaPatrick KeownHelen ParsonsOrla McBrideLiz TwiggJan Scott
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (15 papers)Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (9 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe British Journal of PsychiatryPsychological Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
David Crepaz‐Keay
39 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Clinical Psychology 310
- General Health Professions 208
- Social Psychology 98
- Psychiatry and Mental health 87
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 40
Countries citing papers authored by David Crepaz‐Keay
This map shows the geographic impact of David Crepaz‐Keay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Crepaz‐Keay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Crepaz‐Keay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Crepaz‐Keay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Crepaz‐Keay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Crepaz‐Keay. The network helps show where David Crepaz‐Keay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Crepaz‐Keay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Crepaz‐Keay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Crepaz‐Keay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Crepaz‐Keay. David Crepaz‐Keay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 108 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About David Crepaz‐Keay
David Crepaz‐Keay is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 43 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (15 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (9 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (310 citations), General Health Professions (208 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (87 citations). David Crepaz‐Keay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott Weich, Kamaldeep Bhui, Eva Cyhlarova, Patrick Keown, Helen Parsons, Orla McBride, Liz Twigg, Jan Scott, Elizabeth Newton and Carole Mockford. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.