Alexandra Parbery‐Clark

4.7k total citations
32 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Alexandra Parbery‐Clark is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Speech and Hearing and 10 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Alexandra Parbery‐Clark's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (31 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (24 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (12 papers). Alexandra Parbery‐Clark is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (31 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (24 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (12 papers). Alexandra Parbery‐Clark collaborates with scholars based in United States, Bulgaria and Canada. Alexandra Parbery‐Clark's co-authors include Nina Kraus, Samira Anderson, Dana L. Strait, Erika Skoe, Travis White‐Schwoch, Emily F. Hittner, Richard Ashley, Han‐Gyol Yi, Samantha O’Connell and Adam Tierney and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Alexandra Parbery‐Clark

31 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Alexandra Parbery‐Clark
Samira Anderson United States
Dana L. Strait United States
Kate Gfeller United States
Gabriella Musacchia United States
Jennifer Krizman United States
Jackson T. Gandour United States
Martina Huss United Kingdom
Kelly L. Tremblay United States
Samira Anderson United States
Alexandra Parbery‐Clark
Citations per year, relative to Alexandra Parbery‐Clark Alexandra Parbery‐Clark (= 1×) peers Samira Anderson

Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Parbery‐Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Parbery‐Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Parbery‐Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Parbery‐Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Parbery‐Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Parbery‐Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Parbery‐Clark. The network helps show where Alexandra Parbery‐Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexandra Parbery‐Clark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexandra Parbery‐Clark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexandra Parbery‐Clark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexandra Parbery‐Clark. Alexandra Parbery‐Clark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, et al.. (2022). Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 859722–859722.
2.
Arenberg, Julie G., et al.. (2019). Assessing Cognitive Abilities in High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12. 1056–1056. 27 indexed citations
3.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Dana L. Strait, Emily F. Hittner, & Nina Kraus. (2013). Musical Training Enhances Neural Processing of Binaural Sounds. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(42). 16741–16747. 26 indexed citations
4.
Strait, Dana L., Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Samantha O’Connell, & Nina Kraus. (2013). Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 6. 51–60. 52 indexed citations
5.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Samira Anderson, & Nina Kraus. (2013). Musicians change their tune: How hearing loss alters the neural code. Hearing Research. 302. 121–131. 24 indexed citations
6.
Strait, Dana L., Samantha O’Connell, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, & Nina Kraus. (2013). Musicians' Enhanced Neural Differentiation of Speech Sounds Arises Early in Life: Developmental Evidence from Ages 3 to 30. Cerebral Cortex. 24(9). 2512–2521. 82 indexed citations
7.
Anderson, Samira, Travis White‐Schwoch, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, & Nina Kraus. (2013). A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Hearing Research. 300. 18–32. 176 indexed citations
8.
Strait, Dana L., Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Emily F. Hittner, & Nina Kraus. (2012). Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise. Brain and Language. 123(3). 191–201. 156 indexed citations
9.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Adam Tierney, Dana L. Strait, & Nina Kraus. (2012). Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables. Neuroscience. 219. 111–119. 100 indexed citations
10.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Samira Anderson, Emily F. Hittner, & Nina Kraus. (2012). Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing. Neurobiology of Aging. 33(7). 1483.e1–1483.e4. 127 indexed citations
11.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Samira Anderson, Emily F. Hittner, & Nina Kraus. (2012). Musical experience strengthens the neural representation of sounds important for communication in middle-aged adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 4. 30–30. 60 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Samira, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Travis White‐Schwoch, & Nina Kraus. (2012). Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding. Journal of Neuroscience. 32(41). 14156–14164. 259 indexed citations
13.
Tierney, Adam, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Erika Skoe, & Nina Kraus. (2011). Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing. Hearing Research. 282(1-2). 145–150. 8 indexed citations
14.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Dana L. Strait, Samira Anderson, Emily F. Hittner, & Nina Kraus. (2011). Musical Experience and the Aging Auditory System: Implications for Cognitive Abilities and Hearing Speech in Noise. PLoS ONE. 6(5). e18082–e18082. 220 indexed citations
15.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Dana L. Strait, & Nina Kraus. (2011). Context-dependent encoding in the auditory brainstem subserves enhanced speech-in-noise perception in musicians. Neuropsychologia. 49(12). 3338–3345. 87 indexed citations
16.
Anderson, Samira, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, Han‐Gyol Yi, & Nina Kraus. (2011). A Neural Basis of Speech-in-Noise Perception in Older Adults. Ear and Hearing. 32(6). 750–757. 167 indexed citations
17.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, Erika Skoe, & Nina Kraus. (2009). Musical Experience Limits the Degradative Effects of Background Noise on the Neural Processing of Sound. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(45). 14100–14107. 313 indexed citations
18.
Parbery‐Clark, Alexandra, et al.. (2009). Musician Enhancement for Speech-In-Noise. Ear and Hearing. 30(6). 653–661. 394 indexed citations
19.
Kraus, Nina, Erika Skoe, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, & Richard Ashley. (2009). Experience‐induced Malleability in Neural Encoding of Pitch, Timbre, and Timing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1169(1). 543–557. 121 indexed citations
20.
Strait, Dana L., Nina Kraus, Alexandra Parbery‐Clark, & Richard Ashley. (2009). Musical experience shapes top-down auditory mechanisms: Evidence from masking and auditory attention performance. Hearing Research. 261(1-2). 22–29. 243 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026