Kate Dawson
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Neurology top 1%
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 10
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 5
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 18
- Co-authors
- John R. HodgesEneida MioshiJoanna MitchellRobert ArnoldCarol BrayneJ. R. HodgesRatnavalli EllajosyulaKaralyn Patterson
- Journals
- Neurology (4 papers)Porn Studies (3 papers)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (3 papers)Brain (2 papers)Journal of Neurology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Dawson
38 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
- Neurology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- Neurology 463
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 201
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Dawson
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Dawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Dawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Dawson. The network helps show where Kate Dawson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 174 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 201 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 142 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 75 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 18 | The Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1483 |
| 19 | 2003 | 176 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 133 |
About Kate Dawson
Kate Dawson is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Physiology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (18 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (11 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (10 papers), Sex work and related issues (9 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (5 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.1k citations), Neurology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Neurology (463 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (201 citations). Kate Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John R. Hodges, Eneida Mioshi, Joanna Mitchell, Robert Arnold, Carol Brayne, J. R. Hodges, Ratnavalli Ellajosyula, Karalyn Patterson, Naida L. Graham and Peter J. Nestor. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Porn Studies, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Brain and Journal of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.