Kate Burns

537 total citations
10 papers, 217 citations indexed

About

Kate Burns is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Burns has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 217 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Kate Burns's work include Social Media and Politics (1 paper), dental development and anomalies (1 paper) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). Kate Burns is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (1 paper), dental development and anomalies (1 paper) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). Kate Burns collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Kate Burns's co-authors include William R. Maples, Michael W. Beets, Joseph A. Durlak, Kin‐Kit Li, Brian R. Flay, Samuel Vuchinich, Alan C. Acock, Frank Snyder, Isaac J. Washburn and Rebekah Grace and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, Journal of Forensic Sciences and Journal of Nursing Education.

In The Last Decade

Kate Burns

7 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kate Burns United States	4	80	58	51	49	48	10	217
Rachel Bernstein United States	9	114 1.4×	82 1.4×	21 0.4×	39 0.8×	11 0.2×	32	232
Anita Sujoldžić Croatia	10	96 1.2×	29 0.5×	4 0.1×	40 0.8×	24 0.5×	43	288
Daniel Eisenberg United States	8	47 0.6×	41 0.7×	14 0.3×	33 0.7×	7 0.1×	67	291
Vanessa Oliver Canada	11	28 0.3×	18 0.3×	17 0.3×	87 1.8×	3 0.1×	22	362
Sarah Dwyer Australia	6	194 2.4×	114 2.0×	19 0.4×	43 0.9×		10	285
Sarah E. Johns United Kingdom	10	49 0.6×	4 0.1×	6 0.1×	38 0.8×	18 0.4×	20	253
Pedro Gutiérrez-Recacha Spain	7	118 1.5×	33 0.6×	89 1.7×	19 0.4×		7	286
Nancy A. Murphy United States	4	125 1.6×	27 0.5×	116 2.3×	60 1.2×		5	250
Susan P. Levine United States	6	192 2.4×	27 0.5×	78 1.5×	33 0.7×		10	387
Ellen Carpenter United States	8	75 0.9×	85 1.5×	50 1.0×	14 0.3×	1 0.0×	18	340

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Burns

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Burns

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Burns. The network helps show where Kate Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Burns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Burns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Burns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Burns. Kate Burns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Jones, Carolyn, et al.. (2020). A preliminary study on the glycosylation of the reproductive tract in the Ostrich (Struthio camelus camelus). Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 56(1). 130–141.

2.

Grace, Rebekah, et al.. (2017). Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and families : the legacy of strong state intervention. 292–317. 2 indexed citations

3.

Burns, Ailsa, et al.. (2009). Strong state intervention: the stolen generations. 190–227. 1 indexed citations

4.

Beets, Michael W., Brian R. Flay, Samuel Vuchinich, et al.. (2009). Use of a Social and Character Development Program to Prevent Substance Use, Violent Behaviors, and Sexual Activity Among Elementary-School Students in Hawaii. American Journal of Public Health. 99(8). 1438–1445. 142 indexed citations

5.

Burns, Kate. (2005). New Technology Briefing: Ten golden rules to search advertising. 6(3). 248–252. 3 indexed citations

6.

Burns, Kate, et al.. (2000). Why Refugees Need Reproductive Health Services. International Family Planning Perspectives. 26(4). 161–161. 4 indexed citations

7.

Burns, Kate. (1997). BOOK REVIEW: Lynn Cherny and Elizabeth Reba Weise. WIRED WOMEN: GENDER AND NEW REALITIES IN CYBERSPACE. Seattle: Seal Press, 1996. Dale Spender. and NATTERING ON THE NET: WOMEN, POWER, AND CYBERSPACE.. NWSA Journal. 9(2). 195–197. 1 indexed citations

8.

Burns, Kate, et al.. (1996). In the sand. 1 indexed citations

9.

Burns, Kate, et al.. (1994). Description of a Stressful Encounter: Appraisal, Threat, and Challenge. Journal of Nursing Education. 33(1). 21–28. 12 indexed citations

10.

Burns, Kate & William R. Maples. (1976). Estimation of Age from Individual Adult Teeth. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 21(2). 343–356. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact