Julie Moore

34 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Julie Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Health Information Management 17
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Safety Research 26
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Oncology 43
Replace Terika McCall with:
Terika McCall United States
Arslaan Javaeed Pakistan
Hiroto Narimatsu Japan
Theresa A. Kessler United States
Patrick Forrest United States
Susan Dinauer United States
Sanniya Khan Ghauri Pakistan
Sean P. Mikles United States
Catherine McNamara United Kingdom
Ana Vujaklija Brajković Croatia
Julie Moore relative to Terika McCall United States Terika McCall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Terika McCall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Moore. The network helps show where Julie Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julie Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julie Moore Line = papers co-authored together Julie Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200736
2 201930
3
Assessing the Utility of Automatic Cancer Registry Notifications Data Extraction from Free-Text Pathology Reports.
201526
4 201718
5 201116
6 198416
7 201615
8
Classification of pathology reports for cancer registry notifications.
201213
9 202011
10
Automated Cancer Registry Notifications: Validation of a Medical Text Analytics System for Identifying Patients with Cancer from a State-Wide Pathology Repository.
201611
11 20219
12 20199
13 20168
14 20217
15 20197
16 19587
17 20206
18 20175
19 20125
20 20204

About Julie Moore

Julie Moore is a scholar working on Oncology, Safety Research, Education, Health Information Management and Cancer Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (2 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (17 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations), Safety Research (26 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Oncology (43 citations). Julie Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Nguyen, Shoni Philpot, Philippa Youl, Nathan Dunn, John O’Dwyer, David Wyld, Kelsey L. Deane, Matthew Courtney, Niki Harré and Shoni Colquist. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Medicine and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact