Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 1%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- David S. JessopDavid SpiegelCheryl KoopmanSandra E. SephtonAndrew SteptoeJane S. Blake-MortimerJanine Giese‐DavisFiona M. Begen
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (16 papers)Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
62 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Clinical Psychology 610
- Behavioral Neuroscience 493
- General Health Professions 398
- Oncology 350
- Social Psychology 344
Countries citing papers authored by Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie M. Turner‐Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie M. Turner‐Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie M. Turner‐Cobb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie M. Turner‐Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie M. Turner‐Cobb. The network helps show where Julie M. Turner‐Cobb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie M. Turner‐Cobb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie M. Turner‐Cobb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie M. Turner‐Cobb. Julie M. Turner‐Cobb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Using child confederates in social stress testing: impact on child cortisol reactivity | 1 |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 211 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 111 | |
| 20 | Book review. Health Psychology. Theory, research and practice. Marks, D.F. Murray, M., Evans, B., & Willig, C. London,: SAGE Publications | 17 |
About Julie M. Turner‐Cobb
Julie M. Turner‐Cobb is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (16 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (10 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (493 citations), Biological Psychiatry (84 citations) and Clinical Psychology (610 citations). Julie M. Turner‐Cobb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David S. Jessop, David Spiegel, Cheryl Koopman, Sandra E. Sephton, Andrew Steptoe, Jane S. Blake-Mortimer, Janine Giese‐Davis, Fiona M. Begen, Heather C. Abercrombie and Cheryl Gore–Felton. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Psychopharmacology and Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.