Jane S. Blake-Mortimer
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 3
- Oncology 3
- Cancer survivorship and care 2
- Co-authors
- David Spiegel (5 shared papers)Heather Hancock (1 shared paper)Kerena Eckert (1 shared paper)Caroline Smith (1 shared paper)Julie M. Turner‐Cobb (2 shared papers)Sandra E. Sephton (2 shared papers)Cheryl Koopman (3 shared papers)Cheryl Gore–Felton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Stress Management (2 papers)European Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Redox Report (1 paper)Journal of Loss and Trauma (1 paper)Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane S. Blake-Mortimer
12 papers receiving 601 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Behavioral Neuroscience 69
- Clinical Psychology 201
- Applied Psychology 37
- Biological Psychiatry 18
- Oncology 128
Countries citing papers authored by Jane S. Blake-Mortimer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane S. Blake-Mortimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane S. Blake-Mortimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane S. Blake-Mortimer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane S. Blake-Mortimer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane S. Blake-Mortimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane S. Blake-Mortimer. The network helps show where Jane S. Blake-Mortimer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jane S. Blake-Mortimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 243 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 190 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 3 |
About Jane S. Blake-Mortimer
Jane S. Blake-Mortimer is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Oncology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (69 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations) and Oncology (128 citations). Jane S. Blake-Mortimer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Spiegel, Heather Hancock, Kerena Eckert, Caroline Smith, Julie M. Turner‐Cobb, Sandra E. Sephton, Cheryl Koopman, Cheryl Gore–Felton, Rachel Kimerling and A H Chalmers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Stress Management, European Journal of Cancer, Redox Report, Journal of Loss and Trauma and Psycho-Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.