Emily Arden‐Close

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Emily Arden‐Close
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 47
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Reproductive Medicine 63
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • General Health Professions 155
Replace Carissa Bonner with:
Carissa Bonner Australia
Carol Rivas United Kingdom
Marij A. Hillen Netherlands
Ann McPherson United Kingdom
Helen Aveyard United Kingdom
Joëlle Kivits France
Celia E. Wills United States
Caroline Rudisill United Kingdom
Ben Heaven United Kingdom
Emma F. France United Kingdom
Emily Arden‐Close relative to Carissa Bonner Australia Carissa Bonner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Carissa Bonner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Arden‐Close

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Arden‐Close's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Arden‐Close with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Arden‐Close more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Arden‐Close

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Arden‐Close. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Arden‐Close. The network helps show where Emily Arden‐Close may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Arden‐Close, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Arden‐Close Line = papers co-authored together Emily Arden‐Close links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015226
2 2017106
3 200881
4 201465
5 201365
6 202265
7 201464
8 201951
9 202048
10 201048
11 200939
12 201137
13 201134
14 202034
15 201332
16 201228
17 201525
18 201323
19 202123
20 201922

About Emily Arden‐Close

Emily Arden‐Close is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (9 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (47 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations), Reproductive Medicine (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations) and General Health Professions (155 citations). Emily Arden‐Close has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Yardley, Ben Ainsworth, Ingrid Müller, Christine Eiser, Allan Pacey, Rona Moss‐Morris, Yori Gidron, Raian Ali, Keith Phalp and Andrew Mayers. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Psycho-Oncology, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Primary Care Respiratory Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact