Emily Arden‐Close

2.4k total citations
60 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Emily Arden‐Close is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Arden‐Close has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Clinical Psychology and 13 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily Arden‐Close's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (9 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers). Emily Arden‐Close is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (9 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (8 papers). Emily Arden‐Close collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and South Africa. Emily Arden‐Close's co-authors include Lucy Yardley, Ben Ainsworth, Ingrid Müller, Nuala McGrath, Christine Eiser, Allan Pacey, Rona Moss‐Morris, Yori Gidron, Raian Ali and Andrew Mayers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Emily Arden‐Close

55 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Arden‐Close United Kingdom 21 354 329 300 244 215 60 1.4k
Ka Ming Chow Hong Kong 26 271 0.8× 253 0.8× 375 1.3× 438 1.8× 94 0.4× 98 1.8k
Wonshik Chee United States 27 670 1.9× 499 1.5× 561 1.9× 196 0.8× 173 0.8× 142 2.1k
Charlotte Delmar Denmark 22 578 1.6× 224 0.7× 466 1.6× 270 1.1× 62 0.3× 112 1.6k
S. Melinda Spencer United States 15 398 1.1× 316 1.0× 147 0.5× 172 0.7× 117 0.5× 39 1.2k
Ann McPherson United Kingdom 16 516 1.5× 247 0.8× 364 1.2× 187 0.8× 60 0.3× 26 1.5k
Tammy Chang United States 23 570 1.6× 261 0.8× 456 1.5× 227 0.9× 77 0.4× 106 1.7k
Neil Jordan United States 24 744 2.1× 132 0.4× 270 0.9× 472 1.9× 131 0.6× 143 2.0k
Majid Barati Iran 19 440 1.2× 197 0.6× 225 0.8× 442 1.8× 237 1.1× 182 1.6k
Lisa McCann United Kingdom 20 422 1.2× 188 0.6× 410 1.4× 114 0.5× 173 0.8× 61 1.5k
Yelena P. Wu United States 28 413 1.2× 395 1.2× 451 1.5× 451 1.8× 126 0.6× 125 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Arden‐Close

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Arden‐Close's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Arden‐Close with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Arden‐Close more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Arden‐Close

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Arden‐Close. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Arden‐Close. The network helps show where Emily Arden‐Close may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Arden‐Close

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Arden‐Close. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Arden‐Close based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Arden‐Close. Emily Arden‐Close is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2025). Effects of dietary recommendations for reducing free sugar intakes, on free sugar intakes, dietary profiles and anthropometry: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal Of Nutrition. 133(5). 694–710. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2024). Motivated by Design: A Codesign Study to Promote Challenging Misinformation on Social Media. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2024(1). 3 indexed citations
6.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2023). ‘Ask a hundred people, you get a hundred definitions’: A comparison of lay and expert understanding of stress and its associations with health. Stress and Health. 40(3). e3328–e3328. 3 indexed citations
7.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2023). Why do we not stand up to misinformation? Factors influencing the likelihood of challenging misinformation on social media and the role of demographics. Technology in Society. 76. 102444–102444. 17 indexed citations
8.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2023). Wellbeing in Addiction Recovery: Does It Differ across Addictions?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(14). 6375–6375.
9.
10.
Arden‐Close, Emily, Sarah Thomas, Steven Ersser, et al.. (2023). Virtual reality used to distract children and young people with long‐term conditions from pain or pruritus: A scoping review using PAGER. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 33(2). 469–480. 4 indexed citations
11.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2022). Transparency in persuasive technology, immersive technology, and online marketing: Facilitating users’ informed decision making and practical implications. Computers in Human Behavior. 139. 107545–107545. 62 indexed citations
12.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2022). Online silence: why do people not challenge others when posting misinformation?. Internet Research. 33(5). 1928–1948. 18 indexed citations
13.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2021). “What kind of man gets depressed after having a baby?” Fathers’ experiences of mental health during the perinatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 21(1). 463–463. 23 indexed citations
14.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2020). The impact of Behçet’s disease on intimate relationships in women: A qualitative study. Chronic Illness. 18(2). 255–267. 4 indexed citations
15.
Mayers, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Supporting women who develop poor postnatal mental health: what support do fathers receive to support their partner and their own mental health?. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1). 359–359. 32 indexed citations
16.
Arden‐Close, Emily & Nuala McGrath. (2017). Health behaviour change interventions for couples: A systematic review. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 96 indexed citations
17.
Arden‐Close, Emily, Lucy Yardley, Sarah Kirby, Mike Thomas, & Anne Bruton. (2017). Patients’ experiences of breathing retraining for asthma: a qualitative process analysis of participants in the intervention arms of the BREATHE trial. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 27(1). 56–56. 4 indexed citations
18.
Watts, Sam, Geraldine Leydon, Emily Arden‐Close, Brian Birch, & George Lewith. (2014). Managing Distress in Prostate Cancer: A Feasibility Study into the Design and Evaluation of a Novel Psychological Support Intervention for Managing Distress in Prostate Cancer. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 20(5). A61–A61.
19.
Eiser, Christine, Emily Arden‐Close, Kathryn Morris, & Allan Pacey. (2011). The legacy of sperm banking: how fertility monitoring and disposal of sperm are linked with views of cancer treatment. Human Reproduction. 26(10). 2791–2798. 37 indexed citations
20.
Arden‐Close, Emily, et al.. (2008). Effects of guided written disclosure on wellbeing in ovarian cancer patients and their partners. Psychology and Health. 23. 56–57. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026