Julie Bertels

702 total citations
33 papers, 407 citations indexed

About

Julie Bertels is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Bertels has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 407 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 10 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Julie Bertels's work include Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers). Julie Bertels is often cited by papers focused on Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers). Julie Bertels collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and Luxembourg. Julie Bertels's co-authors include Arnaud Destrebecqz, Régine Kolinsky, José Morais, Mathieu Bourguignon, Xavier De Tiège, Axel Cleeremans, Vincent Wens, Marc Vander Ghinst, Arnaud Destrebecqz and Vinciane Gaillard and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Julie Bertels

32 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julie Bertels Belgium 13 288 154 123 53 41 33 407
Elisabeth Fonteneau United Kingdom 12 383 1.3× 189 1.2× 151 1.2× 69 1.3× 24 0.6× 17 494
Aaron D. Mitchel United States 10 207 0.7× 209 1.4× 217 1.8× 34 0.6× 52 1.3× 18 423
Florian Hintz Netherlands 10 255 0.9× 173 1.1× 117 1.0× 30 0.6× 43 1.0× 37 340
Tuomas Teinonen Finland 6 282 1.0× 324 2.1× 248 2.0× 28 0.5× 27 0.7× 7 543
Anahita Basirat France 8 266 0.9× 87 0.6× 189 1.5× 60 1.1× 34 0.8× 20 369
Annette Hohlfeld Germany 10 512 1.8× 221 1.4× 137 1.1× 41 0.8× 32 0.8× 14 606
Mathias Scharinger Germany 16 520 1.8× 119 0.8× 372 3.0× 48 0.9× 35 0.9× 50 655
Laura Gwilliams United States 12 371 1.3× 138 0.9× 130 1.1× 24 0.5× 52 1.3× 28 476
Jacolien van Rij Netherlands 11 259 0.9× 167 1.1× 177 1.4× 29 0.5× 100 2.4× 34 472
Alice H. D. Chan Singapore 13 403 1.4× 142 0.9× 320 2.6× 117 2.2× 14 0.3× 28 604

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bertels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bertels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bertels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bertels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bertels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bertels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bertels. The network helps show where Julie Bertels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Bertels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Bertels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Bertels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Bertels. Julie Bertels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wens, Vincent, et al.. (2025). Pushing the boundaries of MEG based on optically pumped magnetometers towards early human life. Imaging Neuroscience. 3. 5 indexed citations
2.
Bertels, Julie, Adélaïde de Heering, Mathieu Bourguignon, Axel Cleeremans, & Arnaud Destrebecqz. (2023). What determines the neural response to snakes in the infant brain? A systematic comparison of color and grayscale stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1027872–1027872. 5 indexed citations
3.
Tiège, Xavier De, et al.. (2023). Speech-derived haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in a multi-talker background. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 16621–16621. 3 indexed citations
4.
Bertels, Julie, Tim Coolen, Marc Vander Ghinst, et al.. (2022). Neurodevelopmental oscillatory basis of speech processing in noise. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 59. 101181–101181. 9 indexed citations
5.
Bertels, Julie, Vincent Wens, Marc Vander Ghinst, et al.. (2022). The role of reading experience in atypical cortical tracking of speech and speech-in-noise in dyslexia. NeuroImage. 253. 119061–119061. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bourguignon, Mathieu, Julie Bertels, Marc Vander Ghinst, et al.. (2022). Cortical tracking of lexical speech units in a multi-talker background is immature in school-aged children. NeuroImage. 265. 119770–119770. 3 indexed citations
7.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2022). Le toucher maternel « gentle touch » : une invitation à une danse tactile ?. Enfance. N° 4(4). 455–478. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2021). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Discrimination of fine‐grained regularities depends on early test trials. Infancy. 27(3). 462–478. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bertels, Julie, Vincent Wens, Marc Vander Ghinst, et al.. (2020). Cortical tracking of speech in noise accounts for reading strategies in children. PLoS Biology. 18(8). e3000840–e3000840. 20 indexed citations
10.
Bertels, Julie, Mathieu Bourguignon, Adélaïde de Heering, et al.. (2020). Snakes elicit specific neural responses in the human infant brain. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 7443–7443. 27 indexed citations
11.
Deliens, Gaétane, et al.. (2018). Referential processing in 3- and 5-year-old children is egocentrically anchored.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 45(8). 1387–1397. 5 indexed citations
12.
Philippe, Morgane, Julie Bertels, Nicolas Coquelet, et al.. (2018). Comparing the potential of MEG and EEG to uncover brain tracking of speech temporal envelope. NeuroImage. 184. 201–213. 38 indexed citations
13.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2016). Learning the association between a context and a target location in infancy. Developmental Science. 20(4). 15 indexed citations
14.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2015). Interacting Effects of Instructions and Presentation Rate on Visual Statistical Learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1806–1806. 14 indexed citations
15.
Bertels, Julie & Régine Kolinsky. (2015). Disentangling fast and slow attentional influences of negative and taboo spoken words in the emotional Stroop paradigm. Cognition & Emotion. 30(6). 1137–1148. 9 indexed citations
16.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2015). Visual statistical learning in children and young adults: how implicit?. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 1541–1541. 26 indexed citations
17.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2013). When a bang makes you run away: Spatial avoidance of threatening environmental sounds. Neuroscience Letters. 535. 78–83. 11 indexed citations
18.
Bertels, Julie, Régine Kolinsky, & José Morais. (2012). Lack of habituation to shocking words: The attentional bias to their spatial origin is context free. Cognition & Emotion. 26(8). 1345–1358. 3 indexed citations
19.
Bertels, Julie, et al.. (2011). Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task.. Emotion. 11(1). 29–37. 14 indexed citations
20.
Bertels, Julie, Régine Kolinsky, & José Morais. (2010). Emotional valence of spoken words influences the spatial orienting of attention. Acta Psychologica. 134(3). 264–278. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026