Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language
2010890 citationsStanislas Dehaene, Lúcia Willadino Braga et al.profile →
Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition
2015423 citationsStanislas Dehaene, Laurent Cohen et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Régine Kolinsky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Régine Kolinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Régine Kolinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Régine Kolinsky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Régine Kolinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Régine Kolinsky. The network helps show where Régine Kolinsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Régine Kolinsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Régine Kolinsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Régine Kolinsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Régine Kolinsky. Régine Kolinsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kolinsky, Régine, et al.. (2014). A cultural side effect: Learning to read interferes with object identity processing. Frontiers in Psychology.2 indexed citations
Kolinsky, Régine, et al.. (2012). How literacy affects vision: Further data on the processing of mirror images by illiterate adults. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
9.
Pattyn, Nathalie, Raymond Cluydts, Eric Soetens, et al.. (2008). Predictive performance assessment: Trait and state dimensions should not be confused. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 553. 13–223.2 indexed citations
Pattyn, Nathalie, et al.. (2005). Investigating human cognitive performance during spaceflight. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 1(12). 39–40.14 indexed citations
Kolinsky, Régine, et al.. (2002). Pourquoi étudier les illettrés. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 37(2). 191–208.2 indexed citations
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro, et al.. (1998). Phonemic awareness in alphabetically literate Japanese adults: the influence of the first acquired writing system. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 17(2). 417–450.9 indexed citations
18.
Morais, José, Régine Kolinsky, Jesüs Alegría, & Leonor Scliar-Cabral. (1998). Alphabetic literacy and psychological structure. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33(4). 61–79.15 indexed citations
19.
Morais, José & Régine Kolinsky. (1996). The Cognitive Constraints of Lifelong Learning..1 indexed citations
20.
Kolinsky, Régine. (1986). L'émergence des habiletés métalinguistiques. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 6(4). 379–404.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.