Julian Hanich
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Winfried MenninghausValentin WagnerThomas JacobsenEugen WassiliwizkyStefan KoelschMilena KuehnastMira ShahInes Schindler
- Topics
- Cinema and Media Studies (16 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers)German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEPsychological Review
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsNorway
In The Last Decade
Julian Hanich
31 papers receiving 913 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 566
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 402
- Social Psychology 344
- Literature and Literary Theory 250
- Sensory Systems 121
Countries citing papers authored by Julian Hanich
This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Hanich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Hanich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Hanich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Hanich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Hanich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Hanich. The network helps show where Julian Hanich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julian Hanich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julian Hanich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julian Hanich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julian Hanich. Julian Hanich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 192 | |
| 3 | 187 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 207 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Review of Eugenie Brinkema: "The Forms of the Affects" (Durham: Duke UP, 2014). | 4 |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | COMPLEX STAGING: THE HIDDEN DIMENSIONS OF ROY ANDERSSON’S AESTHETICS | 2 |
| 13 | 124 | |
| 14 | Auslassen, Andeuten, Auffüllen. Der Film und die Imagination des Zuschauers | 1 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Motive des Films. Ein kasuistischer Fischzug | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Laugh is in the Air. Eine Typologie des Lachens im Kino | 1 |
| 19 | Collective Viewing. The Cinema and Affective Audience Interrelations | 1 |
| 20 | 13 |
About Julian Hanich
Julian Hanich is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (16 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (7 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (402 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (566 citations) and Sensory Systems (121 citations). Julian Hanich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Winfried Menninghaus, Valentin Wagner, Thomas Jacobsen, Eugen Wassiliwizky, Stefan Koelsch, Milena Kuehnast, Mira Shah, Ines Schindler, Jane Stadler and Jens Eder. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.