Ines Schindler
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martin PinquartWinfried MenninghausValentin WagnerGeorg HosoyaUrsula BeermannKlaus R. SchererMichael EidThomas Jacobsen
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers)Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (6 papers)Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Neuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDemography
- Journals
- PLoS ONEPsychological ReviewPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Ines Schindler
23 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Social Psychology 432
- Cognitive Neuroscience 331
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 309
- Demography 258
- General Health Professions 177
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Schindler
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Schindler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Schindler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Schindler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Schindler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Schindler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Schindler. The network helps show where Ines Schindler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ines Schindler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ines Schindler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ines Schindler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ines Schindler. Ines Schindler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 192 | |
| 5 | Is it morally good to admire? Psychological perspectives on the potentials and limits of admiration and elevation | 0 |
| 6 | 210 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 241 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | Late-Life Development of Personal Life Investment: The Musts and Cans of Aging | 4 |
About Ines Schindler
Ines Schindler is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (6 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (65 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (309 citations) and Demography (258 citations). Ines Schindler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Martin Pinquart, Winfried Menninghaus, Valentin Wagner, Georg Hosoya, Ursula Beermann, Klaus R. Scherer, Michael Eid, Thomas Jacobsen, Julian Hanich and Eugen Wassiliwizky. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Review and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.