Julia Suess–Reyes

13 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers

Julia Suess–Reyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 667
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 497
  • Accounting 381
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
Replace Ondřej Machek with:
Ondřej Machek Czechia
Jorunn Grande Norway
Valeriano Sanchez‐Famoso Spain
Luu Tien Dung Vietnam
Sarath S. Kodithuwakku Sri Lanka
Σοφία Σταθοπούλου Greece
Maria Lúcia Pato Portugal
Torben Bager Denmark
Emilio Pindado Spain
Shova Thapa Karki United Kingdom
Julia Suess–Reyes relative to Ondřej Machek Czechia Ondřej Machek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Ondřej Machek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Suess–Reyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Suess–Reyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Suess–Reyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Suess–Reyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Suess–Reyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Suess–Reyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Suess–Reyes. The network helps show where Julia Suess–Reyes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Suess–Reyes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Suess–Reyes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Suess–Reyes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Suess–Reyes. Julia Suess–Reyes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 11
3
Co-creation in (Citizen) Science:Unbundling the Concept and Identifying Key Challenges
1
4 102
5 1
6 30
7 2
8 39
9 161
10 59
11 175
12
Erfolgsfaktoren landwirtschaftlicher Familienbetriebe in Niederösterreich
1
13 124
14
The role of family governance practices and bonding ownership social capital for predicting the commitment to growing family wealth
0
15 123

About Julia Suess–Reyes

Julia Suess–Reyes is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Business Performance and Succession (12 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (497 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (667 citations) and Accounting (381 citations). Julia Suess–Reyes has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Elena Fuetsch, Hermann Frank, Susanne Beck, Alexander Keßler, Reinhard Prügl, Alessandro Minichilli, Andrea Calabrò, Thomas Rusch, Daniela Weismeier–Sammer and Marion Poetz. Their work appears in journals such as Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Journal of Rural Studies and Journal of Family Business Strategy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026