Julia Braverman

52 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Julia Braverman
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Applied Psychology 112
  • Clinical Psychology 382
  • Marketing 166
  • Family Practice 29
  • General Decision Sciences 30
Replace John J. Murphy with:
John J. Murphy United States
R. Brian Giesler United States
John P. Keating New Zealand
Shoshana Shiloh Israel
Tove I. Dahl Norway
Eileen M. Donahue United States
Linda A. Sullivan United States
Philip A. Goldberg United States
Steven Shepherd United States
Kwok Kit Tong Macao
Julia Braverman relative to John J. Murphy United States John J. Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
John J. Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Braverman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Braverman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Braverman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Braverman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Braverman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Braverman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Braverman. The network helps show where Julia Braverman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Braverman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Braverman Line = papers co-authored together Julia Braverman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004236
2 2008171
3 2002166
4 2010129
5 201469
6 201363
7 201854
8
Predictors of medication adherence for African American patients diagnosed with hypertension.
200947
9 202139
10 201833
11 201123
12 201622
13 201820
14 202218
15 201618
16 200516
17 200215
18 201814
19 202013
20 201012

About Julia Braverman

Julia Braverman is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CAR-T cell therapy research (17 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (5 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (382 citations), Marketing (166 citations), Family Practice (29 citations) and General Decision Sciences (30 citations). Julia Braverman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Howard J. Shaffer, David DeSteno, Duane T. Wegener, Derek D. Rucker, Richard E. Petty, Monica Y. Bartlett, Peter Salovey, Julien Dedier, Sarah E. Nelson and Debi A. LaPlante. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Allergy and Asthma Proceedings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Value in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact