Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer
2016649 citationsMaria Gloria Domínguez-Bello, Nan Shen et al.Nature Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Juana I Rivera-Viñas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Juana I Rivera-Viñas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juana I Rivera-Viñas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juana I Rivera-Viñas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juana I Rivera-Viñas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juana I Rivera-Viñas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juana I Rivera-Viñas. The network helps show where Juana I Rivera-Viñas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juana I Rivera-Viñas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juana I Rivera-Viñas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juana I Rivera-Viñas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Juana I Rivera-Viñas. Juana I Rivera-Viñas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rabionet, Silvia E, et al.. (2018). Pregnancy and Zika: The Quest for Quality Care and Reproductive Justice.. PubMed. 37(Spec Issue). S45–S50.4 indexed citations
3.
Zorrilla, Carmen, et al.. (2018). The Zika Virus Infection in Pregnancy: Review and Implications for Research and Care of Women and Infants in Affected Areas.. PubMed. 37(Spec Issue). S66–S72.5 indexed citations
4.
Rivera-Viñas, Juana I, et al.. (2017). A Pilot Study of the Perceptions of Actively Practicing Obstetricians in Puerto Rico: Factors that Influence Decision Making in Cesarean Delivery.. PubMed. 36(1). 17–23.1 indexed citations
5.
Zorrilla, Carmen, et al.. (2017). Improved Infant Outcomes with Group Prenatal Care in Puerto Rico.. PubMed. 1(1).5 indexed citations
6.
Domínguez-Bello, Maria Gloria, Nan Shen, Laura M. Cox, et al.. (2016). Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nature Medicine. 22(3). 250–253.649 indexed citations breakdown →
Méndez, Keimari, et al.. (2014). Risk factors for hysterectomy in abnormal placentation at the University District Hospital.. PubMed. 106(1). 27–9.1 indexed citations
9.
Rivera-Viñas, Juana I, et al.. (2014). Uterine curettage post-partum patients with severe preeclampsia: removal of trophoblastic tissue can alter the progression of this condition.. PubMed. 106(1). 69–70.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.