Joseph C. Speisman
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Richard S. LazarusArnold M. MordkoffKathleen M. WhiteDaryl CostosWilbert J. McKeachieRudolf H. MoosEli A. RubinsteinFranklyn N. Arnhoff
- Topics
- Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Joseph C. Speisman
21 papers receiving 651 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Social Psychology 337
- Clinical Psychology 261
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
- Cognitive Neuroscience 128
- Sociology and Political Science 114
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph C. Speisman
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph C. Speisman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph C. Speisman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph C. Speisman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph C. Speisman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph C. Speisman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph C. Speisman. The network helps show where Joseph C. Speisman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph C. Speisman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph C. Speisman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph C. Speisman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph C. Speisman. Joseph C. Speisman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | An Objective Instrument for Assessment of Erikson's Developmental Conflicts. Presentation Summary. | 1 |
| 6 | Research Approaches to Personality | 3 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Manpower for mental health | 24 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 191 | |
| 14 | 107 | |
| 15 | 156 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About Joseph C. Speisman
Joseph C. Speisman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Applied Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (24 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (228 citations) and Social Psychology (337 citations). Joseph C. Speisman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Lazarus, Arnold M. Mordkoff, Kathleen M. White, Daryl Costos, Wilbert J. McKeachie, Rudolf H. Moos, Eli A. Rubinstein, Franklyn N. Arnhoff, Forrest B. Tyler and John P. Houlihan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Psychologist and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.