Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Emotion And Adaptation
19915.6k citationsRichard S. LazarusMedical Entomology and Zoologyprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Richard S. Lazarus
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard S. Lazarus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard S. Lazarus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard S. Lazarus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard S. Lazarus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard S. Lazarus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard S. Lazarus. The network helps show where Richard S. Lazarus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard S. Lazarus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard S. Lazarus.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard S. Lazarus based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard S. Lazarus. Richard S. Lazarus is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lazarus, Richard S., et al.. (2019). Stress: Treatment, and Management. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing eBooks.
Lazarus, Richard S., et al.. (2007). The Praeger handbook on stress and coping. Praeger eBooks.62 indexed citations
4.
Lazarus, Richard S., et al.. (2006). Coping with Aging.30 indexed citations
5.
Lazarus, Richard S.. (2005). Emotions and Interpersonal Relationships: Toward a Person‐Centered Conceptualization of Emotions and Coping. Journal of Personality. 74(1). 9–46.512 indexed citations breakdown →
Folkman, Susan, Richard S. Lazarus, Christine Dunkel‐Schetter, Anita DeLongis, & Rand J. Gruen. (2000). The dynamics of a stressful encounter..88 indexed citations
8.
Lazarus, Richard S.. (1999). Hope: An Emotion and a Vital Coping Resource Against Despair. 66.339 indexed citations
9.
Lazarus, Richard S.. (1991). Psychological stress in the workplace. Journal of social behavior and personality.341 indexed citations
10.
Lazarus, Richard S.. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion.. American Psychologist. 46(8). 819–834.1421 indexed citations breakdown →
Folkman, Susan, et al.. (1987). Age differences in stress and coping processes.. Psychology and Aging. 2(2). 171–184.560 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Dunkel‐Schetter, Christine, Susan Folkman, & Richard S. Lazarus. (1987). Correlates of social support receipt.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53(1). 71–80.204 indexed citations
16.
Lazarus, Richard S., Edward M. Opton, & James R. Averill. (1969). Adaptación Psicológica y Emociones (parte A). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1. 105–132.1 indexed citations
17.
Lazarus, Richard S. & Edward M. Opton. (1967). Personality : selected readings. Penguin Books.1 indexed citations
18.
Lazarus, Richard S., et al.. (1967). Group treatment of autistic children. Prentice Hall eBooks.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.