Joost Smid
Impact in
- Food Science top 2%
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Food Safety and Hygiene
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
Papers in
- Food Science 18
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 13
- Food Safety and Hygiene 7
-
- Vibrio bacteria research studies 6
- Co-authors
- Arie H. Havelaar (11 shared papers)Wilfrid van Pelt (6 shared papers)Nigel French (4 shared papers)Jaap A. Wagenaar (4 shared papers)Luca Busani (4 shared papers)Lapo Mughini Gras (3 shared papers)Ingrid Friesema (3 shared papers)Annemarie Pielaat (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (4 papers)Epidemiology and Infection (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Risk Analysis (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joost Smid
23 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Food Science 506
- Endocrinology 107
- Biotechnology 149
- Infectious Diseases 232
- Molecular Medicine 62
Countries citing papers authored by Joost Smid
This map shows the geographic impact of Joost Smid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost Smid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost Smid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joost Smid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost Smid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost Smid. The network helps show where Joost Smid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joost Smid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 160 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 1 |
About Joost Smid
Joost Smid is a scholar working on Food Science, Endocrinology, Infectious Diseases, Biotechnology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (13 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (7 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (6 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (5 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (5 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (4 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (506 citations), Endocrinology (107 citations), Biotechnology (149 citations), Infectious Diseases (232 citations) and Molecular Medicine (62 citations). Joost Smid has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arie H. Havelaar, Wilfrid van Pelt, Nigel French, Jaap A. Wagenaar, Luca Busani, Lapo Mughini Gras, Ingrid Friesema, Annemarie Pielaat, Albert G. de Boer and Gary C. Barker. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, Epidemiology and Infection, PLoS ONE, Risk Analysis and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.