Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The business model concept: theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
2003585 citationsJonas Hedman, Thomas Kallingprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Hedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Hedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Hedman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Hedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Hedman. The network helps show where Jonas Hedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonas Hedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonas Hedman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonas Hedman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonas Hedman. Jonas Hedman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2019). IN THE SEARCH OF NEW PERSPECTIVE ON ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
3.
Avital, Michel, et al.. (2019). Development Dynamics of Digital Infrastructure and Organization: The Case of Global Payments Innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1456.4 indexed citations
4.
Avital, Michel, et al.. (2017). Smart Money: Blockchain-based Customizable Payments System. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 7(3). 104–106.6 indexed citations
5.
Xiao, Xiao, Jonas Hedman, Felix Ter Chian Tan, et al.. (2017). Sports Digitalization: A Review and A Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.6 indexed citations
6.
Xiao, Xiao, Felix Ter Chian Tan, Eric T.K. Lim, et al.. (2017). Sports Digitalization : An Overview and A Research Agenda. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).18 indexed citations
7.
Medaglia, Rony, Jonas Hedman, & Ben Eaton. (2017). It Takes Two to Tango: Power Dependence in the Governance of Public-Private e-Government Infrastructures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
8.
Tan, Felix Ter Chian, Jonas Hedman, & Xiao Xiao. (2017). Beyond ‘Moneyball’ to Analytics Leadership in Sports: An Ecological Analysis of FC Bayern Munich’s Digital Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10.10 indexed citations
9.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2015). Payment Instrument Characteristics: A Repertory Grid Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 118635.1 indexed citations
10.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2013). DIGITAL TRACES OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS : SOCIOMATERIALITY MADE RESEARCHABLE. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 1069.22 indexed citations
11.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2013). Evolution Of Business Models: A Case Study Of SAP. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 176.7 indexed citations
12.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2012). Framework for Mobile Payments Integration. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 15(1). 13–24.19 indexed citations
13.
Hedman, Jonas, Stefan Henningsson, & Lisen Selander. (2012). Organizational Self-Renewal: The Role of Green IS in Developing Eco-Effectiveness. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 853–871.9 indexed citations
14.
Bødker, Mads, et al.. (2010). Technology Use: Time-In or Time-Out. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 135.2 indexed citations
15.
Andersson, Bo & Jonas Hedman. (2007). Diffusion of Advanced Mobile Services: A Survey of Large Swedish Firms. Borås Academic Digital Archive (University of Borås).2 indexed citations
16.
Andersson, Bo & Jonas Hedman. (2007). Developing m-Services; lesson learned from a developers Perspective. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 20. 605–620.1 indexed citations
17.
Hedman, Jonas, et al.. (2005). Broadening Information Systems Evalutation Through Narratives. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 8(2). 115–122.12 indexed citations
18.
Hedman, Jonas & Thomas Kalling. (2002). IT and Business Models. Theories and Concepts. Lund University Publications (Lund University).2 indexed citations
19.
Hedman, Jonas & Thomas Kalling. (2002). Behind the Scenes of the E-Business Construct. Lund University Publications (Lund University).3 indexed citations
20.
Hedman, Jonas & Thomas Kalling. (2002). The Business Model : A Means to Comprehend the Management and Business Context of Information and Communication Technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 148–162.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.