Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Eliasson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Eliasson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Eliasson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Eliasson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Eliasson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Eliasson. The network helps show where Jonas Eliasson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonas Eliasson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonas Eliasson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonas Eliasson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonas Eliasson. Jonas Eliasson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fearnley, Nils, et al.. (2015). Measuring the patronage impact of soft quality improvements in urban public transport.1 indexed citations
7.
Börjesson, Maria, Jonas Eliasson, & Mattias Lundberg. (2014). Is CBA Ranking of Transport Investments Robust?. Journal of transport economics and policy. 48(2). 189–204.23 indexed citations
8.
Welde, Morten, Jonas Eliasson, James Odeck, & Maria Börjesson. (2013). The Use of Cost-benefit Analyses in Norway and Sweden: A Comparison.3 indexed citations
9.
Eliasson, Jonas, et al.. (2011). Congestion charges and labour market imperfections : “Wider economic benefits” or “losses”?. Journal of Urban Economics.1 indexed citations
10.
Börjesson, Maria, Jonas Eliasson, & Mattias Lundberg. (2011). ARE CBA RESULTS ROBUST? EXPERIENCES FROM THE SWEDISH TRANSPORT INVESTMENT PLAN, 2010-2021.
11.
Börjesson, Maria & Jonas Eliasson. (2011). Experiences from the Swedish Value of Time study. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
12.
Eliasson, Jonas & Mattias Lundberg. (2010). Do Cost-Benefit Analyses Really Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Experiences from the Swedish National Transport Investment Plan 2010-2021.8 indexed citations
13.
Börjesson, Maria, Jonas Eliasson, & Joel P. Franklin. (2010). The Value of Travel Time Reliability for Transit Passengers.2 indexed citations
14.
Börjesson, Maria & Jonas Eliasson. (2008). Train passengers' valuation of travel time unreliability.4 indexed citations
15.
Börjesson, Maria & Jonas Eliasson. (2007). The value of time of car drivers choosing route : evidence from the Stockholm congestion charging trial. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 14.4 indexed citations
16.
Karlström, Anders, Jonas Eliasson, & A. Levander. (2007). On the theoretical valuation of marginal business travel time savings.5 indexed citations
17.
Eliasson, Jonas. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis of the the Stockholm congestion charging system using observed, real-world data.5 indexed citations
18.
Eliasson, Jonas. (2006). Forecasting travel time variability. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).17 indexed citations
Algers, Staffan, et al.. (2001). Activity-based model development to support transport planning in the Stockholm region. Econstor (Econstor).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.