Jon Bartrip

435 citations
8 papers · 236 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Bartrip

8 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Jon Bartrip
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 107
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 68
  • Clinical Psychology 90
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 27
Replace Ulrich Natke with:
Ulrich Natke Germany
Ton G. Wempe Netherlands
Elvira Mendoza Spain
Linda J. Ferrier United States
Rob Willson Australia
Brenda Nicodemus United States
Sofia Strömbergsson Sweden
Teija Waaramaa Finland
Nicholas W. Bankson United States
Caroline Bowen Australia
Jon Bartrip relative to Ulrich Natke Germany Ulrich Natke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ulrich Natke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Bartrip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Bartrip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Bartrip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Bartrip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Bartrip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Bartrip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Bartrip. The network helps show where Jon Bartrip may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jon Bartrip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Bartrip Line = papers co-authored together Jon Bartrip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 200963
2 200159
3 199230
4 200925
5 198822
6 200920
7 199314
8
Effectiveness of frequency shifted feedback at reducing disfluency for linguistically easy, and difficult, sections of speech (original audio recordings included).
20043

About Jon Bartrip

Jon Bartrip is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Linguistics and Language, having authored 8 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (107 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 citations), Clinical Psychology (90 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (27 citations). Jon Bartrip has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Peter Howell, Stephen R. Davis, John Morton, Scania de Schonen, Suzanne Dziurawiec, Mark H. Johnson, Judith I. Laszlo, Phillip J. Bairstow, Andrew Anderson and Annette Karmiloff‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Discourse Processes, Infant Behavior and Development, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Support for Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact