Ton G. Wempe

653 total citations
12 papers, 472 citations indexed

About

Ton G. Wempe is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ton G. Wempe has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 472 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ton G. Wempe's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). Ton G. Wempe is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). Ton G. Wempe collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Ton G. Wempe's co-authors include Nivja H. de Jong, L.C.W. Pols, Corina J. van As‐Brooks, Harm van Tinteren, Frans J. M. Hilgers and Elena Lyakso and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Behavior Research Methods and Speech Communication.

In The Last Decade

Ton G. Wempe

9 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ton G. Wempe Netherlands	5	225	177	136	126	84	12	472
Jörgen Pind Iceland	10	252 1.1×	114 0.6×	113 0.8×	48 0.4×	132 1.6×	28	392
Sam Tilsen United States	13	484 2.2×	230 1.3×	152 1.1×	70 0.6×	190 2.3×	59	607
Noël Nguyen France	14	478 2.1×	204 1.2×	106 0.8×	83 0.7×	201 2.4×	57	601
James D. Harnsberger United States	14	446 2.0×	265 1.5×	167 1.2×	84 0.7×	154 1.8×	32	738
Caterina Petrone France	10	243 1.1×	95 0.5×	67 0.5×	119 0.9×	100 1.2×	30	338
Susannah V. Levi United States	15	435 1.9×	143 0.8×	163 1.2×	105 0.8×	166 2.0×	40	584
Melissa A. Redford United States	13	389 1.7×	147 0.8×	259 1.9×	87 0.7×	157 1.9×	55	548
Cynthia Fong Malaysia	3	303 1.3×	227 1.3×	108 0.8×	122 1.0×	144 1.7×	6	478
Jelena Krivokapić United States	13	585 2.6×	300 1.7×	169 1.2×	238 1.9×	135 1.6×	39	733

Countries citing papers authored by Ton G. Wempe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ton G. Wempe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton G. Wempe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton G. Wempe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ton G. Wempe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton G. Wempe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton G. Wempe. The network helps show where Ton G. Wempe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ton G. Wempe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ton G. Wempe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ton G. Wempe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ton G. Wempe. Ton G. Wempe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2011). THE ACQUISITION OF HUNGARIAN HIGH FRONT UNROUNDED SHORT VS. LONG VOWELS. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2252–2255.

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2010). Acoustic Analysis of the Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in Dutch Tracheoesophageal Speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 53(2). 284–297. 8 indexed citations

Jong, Nivja H. de & Ton G. Wempe. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods. 41(2). 385–390. 423 indexed citations

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2008). Comparing deaf and hearing Dutch infants: Changes in the vowel space in the first 2 years. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 22(10-11). 835–844. 1 indexed citations

Jong, Nivja H. de & Ton G. Wempe. (2007). Automatic measurement of speech rate in spoken Dutch. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2(2). 49–58. 19 indexed citations

Lyakso, Elena, et al.. (2006). Developing a Russian vowel space in infancy: The first two years. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 561–566. 1 indexed citations

Pols, L.C.W., et al.. (2006). Vowel data of early speech development in several languages. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 4 indexed citations

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2005). Cross-linguistic comparison of two-year-old children's acoustic vowel spaces: contrasting Hungarian with dutch. 1173–1176. 3 indexed citations

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2005). Exploring the acoustic vowel space in two-year-old children: Results for Dutch and Hungarian. Speech Communication. 47(1-2). 143–159. 5 indexed citations

10.

Wempe, Ton G.. (2003). The Interactive Design of an F0-Related Spectral Analyser. 1 indexed citations

11.

Wempe, Ton G., et al.. (2003). Progression in infants' vowel space: an analysis of deaf and hearing infants' sounds. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 2225–2228. 4 indexed citations

12.

Pols, L.C.W., et al.. (2003). Progression in vowel production: comparing deaf and hearing children. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 25. 197–206. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact