Ton G. Wempe

9 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Ton G. Wempe
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 225
  • Artificial Intelligence 177
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 136
  • Language and Linguistics 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84
Replace Cynthia Fong with:
Cynthia Fong Malaysia
Egidio Marsico France
Henning Reetz Germany
Cecilia Kirk United States
Klaus J. Köhler Germany
Felix Schaeffler United Kingdom
Caterina Petrone France
Sudaporn Luksaneeyanawin Thailand
Susannah V. Levi United States
Rebecca M. Dauer United States
Ton G. Wempe relative to Cynthia Fong Malaysia Cynthia Fong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Cynthia Fong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ton G. Wempe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ton G. Wempe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton G. Wempe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton G. Wempe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ton G. Wempe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton G. Wempe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton G. Wempe. The network helps show where Ton G. Wempe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ton G. Wempe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ton G. Wempe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ton G. Wempe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ton G. Wempe. Ton G. Wempe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
THE ACQUISITION OF HUNGARIAN HIGH FRONT UNROUNDED SHORT VS. LONG VOWELS
0
2 8
3 423
4 1
5
Automatic measurement of speech rate in spoken Dutch
19
6
Developing a Russian vowel space in infancy: The first two years
1
7
Vowel data of early speech development in several languages
4
8 5
9 3
10
The Interactive Design of an F0-Related Spectral Analyser
1
11
Progression in infants' vowel space: an analysis of deaf and hearing infants' sounds
4
12
Progression in vowel production: comparing deaf and hearing children
3

About Ton G. Wempe

Ton G. Wempe is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 12 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (9 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (225 citations), Linguistics and Language (56 citations) and Language and Linguistics (126 citations). Ton G. Wempe has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nivja H. de Jong, L.C.W. Pols, Corina J. van As‐Brooks, Harm van Tinteren, Elena Lyakso and Frans J. M. Hilgers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Behavior Research Methods and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026