Jon Baggaley

62 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Jon Baggaley
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Computer Science Applications 164
  • Communication 61
  • Education 228
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 49
Replace Nina Bonderup Dohn with:
Nina Bonderup Dohn Denmark
Bonnie Stewart Canada
Mercedes Fisher United States
Adile Aşkım Kurt Türkiye
Pedro De Bruyckere Netherlands
Ümmühan Avcı Türkiye
Ibis Marlene Álvarez Valdivia Spain
Theodore Panitz United States
Jekaterina Rogaten United Kingdom
Tina Matuchniak United States
Jon Baggaley relative to Nina Bonderup Dohn Denmark Nina Bonderup Dohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nina Bonderup Dohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Baggaley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Baggaley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Baggaley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Baggaley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Baggaley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Baggaley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Baggaley. The network helps show where Jon Baggaley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jon Baggaley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Baggaley Line = papers co-authored together Jon Baggaley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201389
2 200837
3 201431
4 197428
5 200520
6
Psychology of the TV image
198019
7 201018
8 198817
9 201416
10 200516
11 202015
12 197512
13 201412
14 197310
15
Harmonizing Global Education: From Genghis Khan to Facebook
20119
16
Experiments in ETV: Further Effects of Camera Angle.
19758
17 20128
18 20078
19 20108
20 20077

About Jon Baggaley

Jon Baggaley is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Communication, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Education and Business and International Management, having authored 72 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (16 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (8 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (164 citations), Communication (61 citations), Education (228 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (49 citations). Jon Baggaley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Steven W. Duck, Margaret Ferguson, Philip J. Brooks, Sharon Clark, Joaquim Romaguera i Ramió, Charles T. Salmon, Cynthia Jorgensen, Ruth Harris, Steve Duck and Janine Jason. Their work appears in journals such as Distance Education, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Learning Media and Technology, Musicae Scientiae and Psychology of Music.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026