John Weckert

50 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

John Weckert
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Information Systems and Management 107
  • Safety Research 98
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Communication 50
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 122
Replace Terrell Ward Bynum with:
Terrell Ward Bynum United States
Apurv Jain United States
Erik Hermann Germany
Kenneth Einar Himma United States
Jason Schultz United States
Tim Gorichanaz United States
Andrew Iliadis United States
Daniel Greene United States
Irina Ene Romania
Daniel C. Howe United States
John Weckert relative to Terrell Ward Bynum United States Terrell Ward Bynum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Terrell Ward Bynum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Weckert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Weckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Weckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Weckert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Weckert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Weckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Weckert. The network helps show where John Weckert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Weckert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Weckert Line = papers co-authored together John Weckert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201092
2 200079
3 201049
4 200633
5
Nanoethics: assessing the nanoscale from an ethical point of view
200432
6 201023
7 200221
8 200020
9 201117
10 201117
11 201516
12 200214
13 200214
14 201313
15 201513
16 200913
17
Selection advisor : an expert system for collection development
199013
18 200612
19 200111
20 199710

About John Weckert

John Weckert is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems, Safety Research and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 53 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (9 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (8 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), E-Government and Public Services (4 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (107 citations), Safety Research (98 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Communication (50 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (122 citations). John Weckert has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include James H. Moor, Seumas Miller, Richard Lucas, Oliver Burmeister, Yeslam Al‐Saggaf, Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, Kirsty Williamson, Forbes Gibb and Stuart G. Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as NanoEthics, Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society, International Journal of Information Management, Ethics and Information Technology and Information Technology and People.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact