Richard Lucas
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Michael J. TelchJohn A. LucasNorman B. SchmidtJohn WeckertHans SchaeferJosemir W. SanderPhilip N. PatsalosYvonne Langan
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (13 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers)Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard Lucas
43 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Clinical Psychology 361
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 226
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Social Psychology 92
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 77
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lucas
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lucas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lucas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lucas. The network helps show where Richard Lucas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Lucas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Lucas. Richard Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | The Boxing Conundrum: Is there a place for a new variant of the sport? | 7 |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Machina Ethica: A Framework for Computers as Kant Moral Persons | 0 |
| 9 | The Psychotic Wavelength: A Psychoanalytic Perspective for Psychiatry | 9 |
| 10 | Ethics and the ICT Industry - A Research Agenda | 2 |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 209 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Richard Lucas
Richard Lucas is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 46 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (226 citations), Clinical Psychology (361 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations). Richard Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Telch, John A. Lucas, Norman B. Schmidt, John Weckert, Hans Schaefer, Josemir W. Sander, Philip N. Patsalos, Yvonne Langan, Nathalie Toublanc and Mark B. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Epilepsia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.