NanoEthics

396 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 396 papers published in NanoEthics in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in NanoEthics usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (157 papers), Sociology and Political Science (79 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (69 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (147 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (56 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NanoEthics are Alfred Nordmann, Sabine Pfeiffer, Philip Brey, Tsjalling Swierstra, Arie Rip, Erik Fisher, Ibo van de Poel, Arianna Ferrari, Armin Grünwald and Peter‐Paul Verbeek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NanoEthics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NanoEthics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NanoEthics.

Countries where authors publish in NanoEthics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NanoEthics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NanoEthics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NanoEthics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025