Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy
2002372 citationsJohn Arquilla, David Ronfeldt et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Arquilla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Arquilla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Arquilla more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Arquilla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Arquilla. The network helps show where John Arquilla may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Arquilla
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Arquilla.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Arquilla based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Arquilla. John Arquilla is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Arquilla, John. (2004). A better way to fight the war on terror; Mobile 'hunter networks' are the right strategy to combat guerrilla fighters. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School).1 indexed citations
4.
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (2003). Redes y guerras en red: el futuro del terrorismo, el crimen organizado y el activismo político. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).3 indexed citations
5.
Arquilla, John. (2002). The Great Cyberwar of 2002. Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School).2 indexed citations
6.
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (2001). The Advent of Netwar (Revisited). Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).22 indexed citations
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (2001). AFTERWORD (SEPTEMBER 2001): THE SHARPENING FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE 1. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).3 indexed citations
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (1997). In Athena's Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa). 52(2). 11.131 indexed citations
16.
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (1997). Information, Power, and Grand Strategy: In Athena's Camp - Section 2. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).2 indexed citations
17.
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (1997). A New Epoch - And Spectrum - Of Conflict. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).9 indexed citations
Arquilla, John & David Ronfeldt. (1997). Looking Ahead: Preparing for Information-Age Conflict. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).6 indexed citations
20.
Arquilla, John, et al.. (1996). Book reviews. Comparative Strategy. 15(4). 387–391.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.