John W. Cramer

838 citations
18 papers · 659 indexed · h-index 10

John W. Cramer

16 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

John W. Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Pharmacology 119
  • Biochemistry 95
  • Cancer Research 164
  • Pharmaceutical Science 60
  • Molecular Biology 327
Replace Jack R. DeBaun with:
Jack R. DeBaun United States
Preston H. Grantham United States
Inga Jakobson Sweden
Edward J. Van Loon United States
J. A. Miller United States
Gerald N. Levy United States
Chi hong B. Chen United States
Helmut R. Gutmann United States
Ching Yung Wang United States
M.D. Reuber United States
John W. Cramer relative to Jack R. DeBaun United States Jack R. DeBaun's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jack R. DeBaun · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Cramer. The network helps show where John W. Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside John W. Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Cramer Line = papers co-authored together John W. Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20038
2 197310
3 19688
4 19672
5 196722
6 19663
7 196228
8 19618
9 196114
10 19611
11 1960239
12
The N- and ringhydroxylation of 2-acetylaminofluorene during carcinogenesis in the rat.
1960175
13 196076
14 19562
15
Calcium metabolism and growth in the rat on a lowphosphorus diet as affected by vitamin D and increases in calcium intake.
19564
16 195630
17 195615
18 195414

About John W. Cramer

John W. Cramer is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Science, Cancer Research and Neurology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (1 paper), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (1 paper), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (1 paper) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (119 citations), Biochemistry (95 citations), Cancer Research (164 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (60 citations) and Molecular Biology (327 citations). John W. Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth C. Miller, James A. Miller, H. Steenbock, Norman Morris, William H. Prusoff, Arnold D. Welch, Vincent J. Pileggi, Hector F. De Luca, Pauline Chang and I. W. Delamore. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biochemical Pharmacology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Experimental Cell Research and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026