H. Steenbock

31 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

H. Steenbock
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 323
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 185
  • Nephrology 77
  • Animal Science and Zoology 67
  • Physiology 167
Replace Harris Schenker with:
Harris Schenker United States
Irwin Clark United States
Szloma Kowarski United States
Marlin W. Walling United States
HP Schedl United States
Ira Wolinsky United States
L Stanková United States
Monique van Abel Netherlands
Roman C. Mühlbauer Switzerland
Christopher Strauch United States
H. Steenbock relative to Harris Schenker United States Harris Schenker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Harris Schenker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Steenbock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Steenbock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Steenbock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Steenbock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Steenbock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Steenbock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Steenbock. The network helps show where H. Steenbock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside H. Steenbock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Steenbock Line = papers co-authored together H. Steenbock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1955137
2 196362
3 195359
4 200956
5 195547
6 196142
7 195739
8 195739
9 195732
10 195231
11 195531
12 195630
13 195330
14 195729
15 196028
16 200117
17 195615
18 195414
19 195513
20 195113

About H. Steenbock

H. Steenbock is a scholar working on Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (3 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers) and Trace Elements in Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (323 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (185 citations), Nephrology (77 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (67 citations) and Physiology (167 citations). H. Steenbock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hector F. De Luca, David C. Herting, Vincent J. Pileggi, Gordon Guroff, Hector F. DeLuca, Sheldon Reiser, John W. Cramer, C.A. Elvehjem, E.B. Hart and J. Waddell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of Nutrition, Nutrition Reviews and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact