Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations
2013871 citationsVicente Milanés, Steven E Shladover et al.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Spring more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Spring. The network helps show where John Spring may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Spring
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Spring.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Spring based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Spring. John Spring is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shladover, Steven E, John Spring, Christopher Nowakowski, et al.. (2018). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) For Partially Automated Truck Platooning.11 indexed citations
6.
Lu, Xiao‐Yun, Dongyan Su, & John Spring. (2013). Coordination of Freeway Ramp Meters and Arterial Traffic Signals Field Operational Test (FOT). PATH research report.2 indexed citations
7.
Milanés, Vicente, Steven E Shladover, John Spring, et al.. (2013). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 15(1). 296–305.871 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Nowakowski, Christopher, et al.. (2011). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Testing Drivers' Choices of Following Distances. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.51 indexed citations
9.
Nowakowski, Christopher, et al.. (2011). SafeTrip 21 Initiative: Networked Traveler Foresighted Driving Field Experiment. PATH research report.2 indexed citations
10.
Nowakowski, Christopher, et al.. (2011). SafeTrip 21 initiative : networked traveler foresighted driving field experiment, final report.. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
11.
Spring, John, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of an Animal Warning System Effectiveness. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
12.
Nowakowski, Christopher, et al.. (2007). Onboard monitoring and reporting for commercial motor vehicle safety.1 indexed citations
13.
Misener, James A, Christopher Nowakowski, Xiao‐Yun Lu, et al.. (2007). Onboard Monitoring and Reporting for Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Final Report.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.