John Spink

3.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
31 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

John Spink is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John Spink has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Molecular Biology, 22 papers in Food Science and 5 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in John Spink's work include Identification and Quantification in Food (22 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (20 papers) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (7 papers). John Spink is often cited by papers focused on Identification and Quantification in Food (22 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (20 papers) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (7 papers). John Spink collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. John Spink's co-authors include Douglas C. Moyer, Markus Lipp, Jeffrey C. Moore, Shaun Kennedy, Karen Everstine, Jonathan W DeVries, Cheri Speier‐Pero, Virginia Wheatley, Chen Chen and Felicia Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Chemistry, Trends in Food Science & Technology and Journal of Food Science.

In The Last Decade

John Spink

31 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 2012 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Spink United States 20 1.5k 1.1k 488 381 185 31 2.2k
Douglas C. Moyer United States 11 717 0.5× 537 0.5× 169 0.3× 124 0.3× 85 0.5× 12 1.0k
Jeffrey C. Moore United States 19 779 0.5× 839 0.8× 490 1.0× 343 0.9× 152 0.8× 31 2.3k
Yaxi Hu Canada 21 696 0.5× 347 0.3× 466 1.0× 619 1.6× 112 0.6× 40 1.6k
Markus Lipp Italy 18 918 0.6× 795 0.8× 383 0.8× 406 1.1× 224 1.2× 41 2.0k
Alain Maquet Belgium 21 543 0.4× 252 0.2× 259 0.5× 242 0.6× 131 0.7× 47 1.4k
Xiong Xiong China 25 1.4k 1.0× 210 0.2× 34 0.1× 439 1.2× 107 0.6× 86 2.1k
Satish Kumar Sharma India 30 1.0k 0.7× 367 0.3× 26 0.1× 163 0.4× 58 0.3× 205 2.8k
Peter McClure United Kingdom 26 521 0.4× 1.2k 1.2× 92 0.2× 183 0.5× 253 1.4× 57 2.7k
Adrian Parr United Kingdom 35 2.8k 1.9× 921 0.9× 62 0.1× 321 0.8× 40 0.2× 65 5.1k
Fredi Schwägele Germany 18 486 0.3× 319 0.3× 167 0.3× 169 0.4× 462 2.5× 56 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John Spink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Spink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Spink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Spink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Spink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Spink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Spink. The network helps show where John Spink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Spink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Spink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Spink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Spink. John Spink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spink, John. (2023). The GFSI food fraud prevention compliance development & requirements: A ten-year review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 138. 766–773. 7 indexed citations
2.
Pöpping, Bert, Neil Buck, Diána Bánáti, et al.. (2022). Food inauthenticity: Authority activities, guidance for food operators, and mitigation tools. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 21(6). 4776–4811. 14 indexed citations
3.
4.
Spink, John, Christopher T. Elliott, Moira Dean, & Cheri Speier‐Pero. (2019). Food fraud data collection needs survey. npj Science of Food. 3(1). 8–8. 14 indexed citations
5.
Cadieux, Brigitte, Lawrence Goodridge, & John Spink. (2019). Gap analysis of the Canadian food fraud regulatory oversight and recommendations for improvement. Food Control. 102. 46–55. 19 indexed citations
6.
Spink, John. (2019). The current state of food fraud prevention: overview and requirements to address ‘How to Start?’ and ‘How Much is Enough?’. Current Opinion in Food Science. 27. 130–138. 28 indexed citations
7.
Spink, John, et al.. (2019). The application of public policy theory to the emerging food fraud risk: Next steps. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 85. 116–128. 34 indexed citations
8.
9.
Spink, John, et al.. (2019). International Survey of Food Fraud and Related Terminology: Preliminary Results and Discussion. Journal of Food Science. 84(10). 2705–2718. 54 indexed citations
10.
Spink, John, Weina Chen, Guangtao Zhang, & Cheri Speier‐Pero. (2019). Introducing the Food Fraud Prevention Cycle (FFPC): A dynamic information management and strategic roadmap. Food Control. 105. 233–241. 20 indexed citations
11.
Spink, John, David L. Ortega, Chen Chen, & Felicia Wu. (2017). Food fraud prevention shifts the food risk focus to vulnerability. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 62. 215–220. 103 indexed citations
12.
Spink, John, et al.. (2016). Food Fraud Prevention: Policy, Strategy, and Decision-Making – Implementation Steps for a Government Agency or Industry. CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry. 70(5). 320–320. 37 indexed citations
13.
Spink, John, Douglas C. Moyer, & Peter I Whelan. (2016). The role of the public private partnership in Food Fraud prevention—includes implementing the strategy. Current Opinion in Food Science. 10. 68–75. 33 indexed citations
14.
Spink, John. (2015). Product fraud and product counterfeiting as a source of terrorist financing. Security Journal. 30(2). 640–645. 8 indexed citations
15.
Spink, John, et al.. (2014). Introducing Food Fraud including translation and interpretation to Russian, Korean, and Chinese languages. Food Chemistry. 189. 102–107. 40 indexed citations
16.
Everstine, Karen, John Spink, & Shaun Kennedy. (2013). Economically Motivated Adulteration (EMA) of Food: Common Characteristics of EMA Incidents. Journal of Food Protection. 76(4). 723–735. 265 indexed citations
17.
Spink, John, et al.. (2012). A review of the economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy methodologies and assessment of currently utilized estimates. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. 36(4). 249–271. 21 indexed citations
18.
Spink, John & Douglas C. Moyer. (2011). Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud. Journal of Food Science. 76(9). R157–63. 575 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Spink, John. (2011). The Challenge of Intellectual Property Enforcement for Agriculture Technology Transfers, Additives, Raw Materials, and Finished Goods against Product Fraud and Counterfeiters. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 16(2). 183–193. 23 indexed citations
20.
Spink, John, Jaswant Singh, & S. Paul Singh. (2011). Review of Package Warning Labels and Their Effect on Consumer Behaviour with Insights to Future Anticounterfeit Strategy of Label and Communication Systems. Packaging Technology and Science. 24(8). 469–484. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026