John Richard Stepp

79 papers receiving 2.4k citations

John Richard Stepp's Hit Papers

Defining biocultural approaches to conservation 2015 · 361 citations
3610+3+7Years since publication100200300

Peers

John Richard Stepp
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Forestry 174
  • Plant Science 1.0k
  • Food Science 467
  • Biochemistry 153
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 367
Replace Yadav Uprety with:
Yadav Uprety Nepal
Selena Ahmed United States
Chunlin Long China
Michael J. Balick United States
Timothy Johns Canada
Robert Bye Mexico
Barbara Burlingame Italy
Charles M. Peters United States
Anthony B. Cunningham South Africa
Manuel Pardo‐de‐Santayana Spain
John Richard Stepp relative to Yadav Uprety Nepal Yadav Uprety's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Yadav Uprety · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Richard Stepp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Richard Stepp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Richard Stepp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Richard Stepp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Richard Stepp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Richard Stepp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Richard Stepp. The network helps show where John Richard Stepp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Richard Stepp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Richard Stepp Line = papers co-authored together John Richard Stepp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Defining biocultural approaches to conservation
Hit paper breakdown →
2015361
2 2001312
3 2019153
4 2004147
5 2004136
6 2014125
7 201079
8 201675
9 201669
10 200367
11 201065
12 200555
13 201655
14 201352
15 201851
16 200347
17
Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology
200243
18 201637
19 201835
20 200534

About John Richard Stepp

John Richard Stepp is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Food Science and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (14 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (11 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (6 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers), Language and cultural evolution (4 papers) and Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (174 citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations), Food Science (467 citations), Biochemistry (153 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (367 citations). John Richard Stepp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel E. Moerman, Selena Ahmed, Rebecca Zarger, Michael C. Gavin, Joe McCarter, Fikret Berkes, Ruifei Tang, Débora Peterson, Aroha Te Pareake Mead and Timothy S. Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Botany, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, Frontiers in Plant Science and Mountain Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact