Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America
2012420 citationsRebecca Zarger, James R. Mihelcic et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Zarger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Zarger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Zarger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Zarger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Zarger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Zarger. The network helps show where Rebecca Zarger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Zarger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Zarger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Zarger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Zarger. Rebecca Zarger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zarger, Rebecca, et al.. (2013). Sharing and Sustaining Maya Environmental Heritage in Southern Belize. CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York).1 indexed citations
Stepp, John Richard, et al.. (2002). Evidence of seasonal hunger in the oral traditions of Jamaicans: an ethnobiological perspective.. 478–495.1 indexed citations
13.
Navone, Graciela Teresa, María Lelia Pochettino, Patricia Arenas, et al.. (2002). Ethnobiology of parasitosis: the case of two Mbyá-Guaraní communities in the province of Misiones, Argentina.. 258–269.2 indexed citations
14.
Oliveira, Francisco de Assis, et al.. (2002). Breu resin harvest by Tembé Indians and its dependence on a bark-boring beetle.. 365–380.4 indexed citations
15.
Stepp, John Richard, et al.. (2002). Patterns and processes of indigenous burning: how to read landscape signatures of past human practices.. 496–508.5 indexed citations
16.
Stepp, John Richard, et al.. (2002). The transfer of traditional phytomedical knowledge among the Warao of Northeastern Venezuela.. 336–350.3 indexed citations
17.
Stepp, John Richard, et al.. (2002). Cherokee system of folk botanical classification from the archival materials of James Mooney.. 139–151.
18.
Stepp, John Richard, et al.. (2002). Is the traditional knowledge of insects important. 207–224.6 indexed citations
19.
Anderson, E. N., John Richard Stepp, F. S. Wyndham, & Rebecca Zarger. (2002). Biodiversity conservation: a new view from Mexico.. 113–122.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.