Aroha Te Pareake Mead

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 648 citations indexed

About

Aroha Te Pareake Mead is a scholar working on Ecology, Social Psychology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Aroha Te Pareake Mead has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 648 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Aroha Te Pareake Mead's work include Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper). Aroha Te Pareake Mead is often cited by papers focused on Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (3 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper). Aroha Te Pareake Mead collaborates with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and United States. Aroha Te Pareake Mead's co-authors include Ruifei Tang, Joe McCarter, Fikret Berkes, Michael C. Gavin, Débora Peterson, John Richard Stepp, Nancy J. Turner, Eleanor J. Sterling, Katherine Turner and Iain J. Davidson‐Hunt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Aroha Te Pareake Mead

7 papers receiving 605 citations

Hit Papers

Defining biocultural approaches to conservation 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aroha Te Pareake Mead Canada 7 262 227 112 91 77 9 648
Ruifei Tang New Zealand 5 232 0.9× 236 1.0× 100 0.9× 113 1.2× 69 0.9× 5 596
John Wagner Canada 10 279 1.1× 239 1.1× 80 0.7× 117 1.3× 114 1.5× 24 679
C. Julián Idrobo Canada 11 203 0.8× 238 1.0× 61 0.5× 110 1.2× 85 1.1× 18 621
Kāwika B. Winter United States 15 239 0.9× 213 0.9× 75 0.7× 81 0.9× 60 0.8× 31 574
Carla Morsello Brazil 17 221 0.8× 343 1.5× 53 0.5× 87 1.0× 64 0.8× 32 757
Débora Peterson Canada 3 200 0.8× 158 0.7× 63 0.6× 55 0.6× 41 0.5× 7 416
Isabel Díaz‐Reviriego Spain 16 208 0.8× 316 1.4× 160 1.4× 157 1.7× 113 1.5× 28 894
L. J. Gorenflo United States 11 165 0.6× 206 0.9× 68 0.6× 59 0.6× 29 0.4× 28 600
Mere Roberts New Zealand 11 159 0.6× 173 0.8× 57 0.5× 106 1.2× 113 1.5× 17 698
Dániel Babai Hungary 18 296 1.1× 305 1.3× 249 2.2× 218 2.4× 108 1.4× 43 961

Countries citing papers authored by Aroha Te Pareake Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aroha Te Pareake Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aroha Te Pareake Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aroha Te Pareake Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aroha Te Pareake Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aroha Te Pareake Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aroha Te Pareake Mead. The network helps show where Aroha Te Pareake Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aroha Te Pareake Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aroha Te Pareake Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aroha Te Pareake Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aroha Te Pareake Mead. Aroha Te Pareake Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Subramanian, Suneetha M., Eszter Kelemen, Alta De Vos, et al.. (2025). Inclusion in body and mind: ensuring full participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decisions related to nature. Ecology and Society. 30(3).
2.
3.
Hudson, Māui, et al.. (2019). Indigenous Perspectives and Gene Editing in Aotearoa New Zealand. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 7. 70–70. 39 indexed citations
4.
Ataria, James M., et al.. (2018). Whakamanahia Te mātauranga o te Māori: empowering Māori knowledge to support Aotearoa’s aquatic biological heritage. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 52(4). 467–486. 23 indexed citations
5.
Gavin, Michael C., Joe McCarter, Fikret Berkes, et al.. (2018). Effective Biodiversity Conservation Requires Dynamic, Pluralistic, Partnership-Based Approaches. Sustainability. 10(6). 1846–1846. 114 indexed citations
6.
Gavin, Michael C., Joe McCarter, Aroha Te Pareake Mead, et al.. (2015). Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30(3). 140–145. 361 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Davidson‐Hunt, Iain J., et al.. (2012). Biocultural Design: A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development in Rural Indigenous and Local Communities. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 82 indexed citations
8.
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake, et al.. (2007). Pacific genes and life patents: Pacific indigenous experiences and analysis of the commodification and ownership of life. 17 indexed citations
9.
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake, et al.. (2007). Pacific Genes & Life Patents: Pacific Indigenous Experiences & Analysis of the Commodification & Ownership of Life. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026