John R. Allison

1.5k citations
58 papers · 848 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John R. Allison

52 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

John R. Allison
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 414
  • Economics and Econometrics 445
  • Accounting 84
  • Animal Science and Zoology 62
  • Strategy and Management 78
Replace Michael A. Boland with:
Michael A. Boland United States
A. van Tilburg Netherlands
Stephane Lemarié France
Tessa Avermaete Belgium
Randall E. Westgren United States
Marvin L. Hayenga United States
Gregory J. Scott Peru
Joan R. Fulton United States
Shaoming Cheng United States
Zainalabidin Mohamed Malaysia
John R. Allison relative to Michael A. Boland United States Michael A. Boland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Michael A. Boland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Allison. The network helps show where John R. Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Allison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John R. Allison Line = papers co-authored together John R. Allison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998100
2 197277
3 196355
4 201052
5 200350
6 200345
7
Extreme Value or Trolls on Top - The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents
200944
8 200041
9 200129
10 200328
11 200323
12 197520
13 200217
14 200516
15
Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation
201415
16 197414
17 200614
18 199114
19 195713
20 199613

About John R. Allison

John R. Allison is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 58 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intellectual Property and Patents (25 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (8 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (7 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Business Law and Ethics (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers) and Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (414 citations), Economics and Econometrics (445 citations), Accounting (84 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (62 citations) and Strategy and Management (78 citations). John R. Allison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and China. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Lemley, Oscar R. Burt, Emerson H. Tiller, R. E. Worthington, Ray O. Hammons, Douglas Baird, Ronald J. Mann, H. C. McCampbell, R. N. Gates and G. L. Newton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Texas law review, Duke Law Journal, HortTechnology and Accountability in Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact