G. L. Newton
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Robert C. LacyHelena ČičkováMilan KozánekO. M. HaleDonald C. SheppardSidney A. ThompsonR. K. HubbardC. V. Booram
- Topics
- Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (11 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers)Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSlovakiaPoland
In The Last Decade
G. L. Newton
56 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Insect Science 1.1k
- Social Psychology 740
- Genetics 423
- Environmental Chemistry 281
- Agronomy and Crop Science 262
Countries citing papers authored by G. L. Newton
This map shows the geographic impact of G. L. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. L. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. L. Newton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. L. Newton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. L. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. L. Newton. The network helps show where G. L. Newton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. L. Newton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. L. Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. L. Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. L. Newton. G. L. Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The use of fly larvae for organic waste treatmentbreakdown → | 447 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | NEMATODE DENSITIES IN YEAR-ROUND FORAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UTILIZING MANURE FERTILIZATION | 2 |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Bacterial pericarditis after heart transplantation: successful management of two cases with catheter drainage and antibiotics. | 3 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 103 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Swine fecal solids as a feed ingredient for sows and steers. | 1 |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About G. L. Newton
G. L. Newton is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Environmental Chemistry and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (11 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (10 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (740 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (281 citations). G. L. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Lacy, Helena Čičková, Milan Kozánek, O. M. Hale, Donald C. Sheppard, Sidney A. Thompson, R. K. Hubbard, C. V. Booram, R. W. Barker and P. R. Utley. Their work appears in journals such as Water Research, Bioresource Technology and Journal of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.