G. J. Gascho
- Plant Science top 2%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Co-authors
- T. P. GainesR. K. HubbardG. L. NewtonG. H. SnyderM. B. ParkerJ. E. HookD. Breese JonesA. K. Alva
- Topics
- Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (15 papers)Peanut Plant Research Studies (12 papers)Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesKenyaSudan
In The Last Decade
G. J. Gascho
76 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Plant Science 866
- Soil Science 375
- Environmental Chemistry 225
- Agronomy and Crop Science 171
- Geochemistry and Petrology 138
Countries citing papers authored by G. J. Gascho
This map shows the geographic impact of G. J. Gascho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. J. Gascho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. J. Gascho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. J. Gascho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. J. Gascho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. J. Gascho. The network helps show where G. J. Gascho may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. J. Gascho
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. J. Gascho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. J. Gascho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. J. Gascho. G. J. Gascho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEMATODE DENSITIES IN YEAR-ROUND FORAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS UTILIZING MANURE FERTILIZATION | 2 |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | Bahiagrass, corn, cotton rotations, and pesticides for managing nematodes, diseases, and insects on peanut. | 29 |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | Peanut-cotton-rye rotations and soil chemical treatment for managing nematodes and thrips. | 6 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Water-sugarcane relationships. | 20 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Growing sweet sorghum as a source of fermentable sugars for energy | 2 |
| 15 | Chloride toxicity of soybeans grown on Atlantic Coast flatwoods soils [Glycine max, cultivars, leaf scorch, potassium chloride fertilizers, Georgia]. | 1 |
| 16 | Energy potential of sugarcane and sweet sorghum | 4 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About G. J. Gascho
G. J. Gascho is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science and Plant Science, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (15 papers), Peanut Plant Research Studies (12 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (375 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (138 citations) and Plant Science (866 citations). G. J. Gascho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and Sudan. Frequent co-authors include T. P. Gaines, R. K. Hubbard, G. L. Newton, G. H. Snyder, M. B. Parker, J. E. Hook, D. Breese Jones, A. K. Alva, J. J. Street and M. B. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Water Resources Research, Journal of Dairy Science and Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.