John Poulter
Impact in
-
- Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Management Information Systems top 10%
Papers in
-
- Archaeological Research and Protection 3
-
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 4
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
- Maritime and Coastal Archaeology 2
- Co-authors
- Peter ChecklandNancy J. Nelson
- Journals
- Memory Studies (1 paper)Scottish Geographical Journal (1 paper)Britannia (1 paper)Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (1 paper)University of Michigan Press eBooks (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Poulter
6 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Management Science and Operations Research 200
- Management Information Systems 50
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 51
- Management of Technology and Innovation 32
- Space and Planetary Science 5
Countries citing papers authored by John Poulter
This map shows the geographic impact of John Poulter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Poulter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Poulter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Poulter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Poulter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Poulter. The network helps show where John Poulter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside John Poulter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 3 | Charting the roads: surveyed frameworks in the Roman conquest of Britain | 2016 | 1 |
| 4 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 7 | Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students | 2007 | 444 |
| 8 | School meals in secondary schools in England | 2004 | 35 |
About John Poulter
John Poulter is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Archeology, Anthropology, Pharmacy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 8 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper) and Philippine History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (200 citations), Management Information Systems (50 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (51 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (32 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (5 citations). John Poulter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Checkland and Nancy J. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Memory Studies, Scottish Geographical Journal, Britannia, Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) and University of Michigan Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.