John M. Fraser

24 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

John M. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 205
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
  • Cultural Studies 114
  • Economics and Econometrics 57
  • Strategy and Management 48
Replace Ming Wan with:
Ming Wan United States
Haryanto Haryanto Indonesia
Adam Segal United States
Cornelia Storz Germany
Michael Y. Yoshino United States
Francesc Solé Parellada Spain
Syarif Hidayatullah Indonesia
Pierre‐Yves Gomez France
Araceli de los Ríos Berjillos Spain
Bruno Dallago Italy
John M. Fraser relative to Ming Wan United States Ming Wan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Ming Wan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Fraser. The network helps show where John M. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Fraser. John M. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Overseas investment in Australia
0
2
Butter and margarine
0
3
Implementing enterprise risk management : case studies and best practices
21
4 3
5 36
6 3
7
Business drivers for building information modelling
5
8 2
9 8
10 27
11 0
12
Common ground : issues that should bind and not divide us
3
13
Saviours of the nation
3
14 29
15 2
16 6
17 17
18 1
19 4
20
Local Government, Grants Commission
1

About John M. Fraser

John M. Fraser is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 32 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Balkans: History, Politics, Society (9 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (5 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (114 citations), Political Science and International Relations (205 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (174 citations). John M. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miranda Vickers, James Gow, Betty J. Simkins, F. B. McDonald, Elizabeth M. Cousens, John Williams, Orville Schell, Edward Friedman, Pierre Martin and Mark R. Brawley. Their work appears in journals such as Supply Chain Management An International Journal, Pacific Affairs and International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026