Cornelia Storz

525 citations
30 papers · 324 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Cornelia Storz

25 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Cornelia Storz
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 81
  • Strategy and Management 123
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Urban Studies 33
  • Accounting 51
Replace María Jesús Rodríguez‐Gulías with:
María Jesús Rodríguez‐Gulías Spain
Morten Fosaas Norway
David Barbera‐Tomás Spain
Paige Clayton United States
Gary Chapman United Kingdom
Anna Ujwary-Gil Poland
Aleksios Gotsopoulos South Korea
Guilherme Ary Plonski Brazil
Sandor Jan Albert Löwik Netherlands
Lucia Marchegiani Italy
Cornelia Storz relative to María Jesús Rodríguez‐Gulías Spain María Jesús Rodríguez‐Gulías's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
María Jesús Rodríguez‐Gulías · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cornelia Storz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cornelia Storz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cornelia Storz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cornelia Storz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cornelia Storz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cornelia Storz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cornelia Storz. The network helps show where Cornelia Storz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Cornelia Storz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cornelia Storz Line = papers co-authored together Cornelia Storz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200851
2 201435
3 201434
4 201331
5 202124
6 201421
7 202116
8 202016
9 200715
10 201614
11 200813
12
Institutional Diversity and Innovation: Continuing and Emerging Patterns in Japan and China
201111
13 20117
14 20115
15 20065
16 20065
17 20234
18 20084
19 20233
20 20152

About Cornelia Storz

Cornelia Storz is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 30 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (10 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (6 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (4 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (81 citations), Strategy and Management (123 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), Urban Studies (33 citations) and Accounting (51 citations). Cornelia Storz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sébastien Lechevalier, Steven Casper, Junichi Nishimura, Tobias ten Brink, Bruno Amable, Henning Kroll, Jackie Krafft, Francesco Quatraro, Andrea Herrmann and Sebastian Schäfer. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Industry and Innovation, Socio-Economic Review, Long Range Planning and Asia Pacific Journal of Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact