Ming Wan

1.0k citations
38 papers · 473 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Wan

35 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Ming Wan
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Development 130
  • Political Science and International Relations 260
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 44
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 182
Replace Adam Segal with:
Adam Segal United States
Scott Kennedy United States
Bryan K. Ritchie United States
Juan Ramón Cuadrado Roura Spain
László Bruszt Austria
Il SaKong
Jesús María Valdaliso Gago Spain
Clyde V. Prestowitz United States
David A. Dyker United Kingdom
Giulio M. Gallarotti United States
Ming Wan relative to Adam Segal United States Adam Segal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Adam Segal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Wan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Wan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Wan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Wan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Wan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Wan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Wan. The network helps show where Ming Wan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ming Wan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Wan Line = papers co-authored together Ming Wan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013149
2 201877
3
Sino-Japanese Relations: Interaction, Logic, and Transformation
200638
4 201637
5 200121
6 200715
7 199511
8 201211
9 200810
10 20039
11 19989
12 20239
13 20169
14 20108
15 20046
16
The China Model and Global Political Economy: Comparison, Impact, and Interaction
20135
17 20075
18 20175
19 20254
20 20154

About Ming Wan

Ming Wan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Development, having authored 38 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (4 papers), International Development and Aid (3 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Human Rights and Development (2 papers) and Economic Zones and Regional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (130 citations), Political Science and International Relations (260 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (44 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (37 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (182 citations). Ming Wan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Asad Abbas, Xiaobao Peng, Saori N. Katada, Lihong Xie, Liubao Gu, Ming Li, Susan J. Pharr, Yi‐Gang Wan, Michael B. McElroy and Chris Nielsen. Their work appears in journals such as The Pacific Review, Asian Survey, Asia-Pacific Review, Journal of Chinese Political Science and The China Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact