John Kulas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Alicia StachowskiLisa M. FinkelsteinYohsuke OhtsuboHamdi MulukFeixue WangMana KomaiJingyu ZhangGabriela Nazar
- Topics
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (6 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
John Kulas
20 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Sociology and Political Science 111
- Social Psychology 108
- Clinical Psychology 66
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 61
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Countries citing papers authored by John Kulas
This map shows the geographic impact of John Kulas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kulas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kulas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Kulas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kulas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kulas. The network helps show where John Kulas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Kulas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Kulas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Kulas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Kulas. John Kulas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Construct and response bias correlates in summated scale definitions of personality traits | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 121 | |
| 13 | SPSS Essentials: Managing and Analyzing Social Sciences Data | 6 |
| 14 | 106 | |
| 15 | Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model. | 5 |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About John Kulas
John Kulas is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 22 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (42 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (61 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). John Kulas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alicia Stachowski, Lisa M. Finkelstein, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Hamdi Muluk, Feixue Wang, Mana Komai, Jingyu Zhang, Gabriela Nazar, Philip J. Grossman and Jiyoon Kim. Their work appears in journals such as The Leadership Quarterly, Public Opinion Quarterly and Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.