Philip J. Grossman
- General Decision Sciences top 0.5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 25
- Safety Research top 0.1%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 68
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Taxation and Compliance Studies 17
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 14
- Demography top 0.5%
- Culture, Economy, and Development Studies 14
- Gender Studies top 2%
-
- Psychology of Social Influence 13
- Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering 9
-
- Game Theory and Applications 10
- Co-authors
- Catherine C. EckelWilliam R. ZameSheryl BallMana KomaiEdwin G. WestPanagiotis MavrosRobert W. WassmerSherry Xin Li
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Grossman
94 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- General Decision Sciences 606
- Safety Research 1.6k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
- Demography 499
- Gender Studies 337
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Grossman
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Grossman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Grossman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Grossman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Grossman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Grossman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Grossman. The network helps show where Philip J. Grossman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip J. Grossman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 7 | The Gender Leadership Gap: Insights from Experiments | 2020 | 1 |
| 8 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 16 | Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence | 2008 | 66 |
| 17 | Is More Information Always Better? An Experimental Study of Charitable Giving and Hurricane Katrina | 2007 | 9 |
| 18 | Status in Markets | 2001 | 28 |
| 19 | Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method on Subjects’ Behavior in Experiments | 2000 | 8 |
| 20 | Property tax assessment bias : a study of the property tax as a user charge | 1984 | 1 |
About Philip J. Grossman
Philip J. Grossman is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 100 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (68 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (17 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (14 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (14 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (13 papers), Game Theory and Applications (10 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (606 citations), Safety Research (1.6k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.5k citations). Philip J. Grossman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Catherine C. Eckel, William R. Zame, Sheryl Ball, Mana Komai, Edwin G. West, Panagiotis Mavros, Robert W. Wassmer, Sherry Xin Li, Angela C. M. de Oliveira and Lata Gangadharan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.