Mana Komai

421 total citations
12 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Mana Komai is a scholar working on Safety Research, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mana Komai has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Safety Research, 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mana Komai's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Game Theory and Applications (7 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers). Mana Komai is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (12 papers), Game Theory and Applications (7 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 papers). Mana Komai collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Mana Komai's co-authors include Mark Stegeman, Philip J. Grossman, Benjamin E. Hermalin, Catherine C. Eckel, Wei Zhan and John Kulas and has published in prestigious journals such as American Economic Review, The Leadership Quarterly and The RAND Journal of Economics.

In The Last Decade

Mana Komai

11 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mana Komai United States	8	181	100	61	58	51	12	250
Jeffrey V. Butler Italy	7	93 0.5×	118 1.2×	71 1.2×	18 0.3×	72 1.4×	13	265
Cheryl L. Eavey United States	6	165 0.9×	64 0.6×	138 2.3×	21 0.4×	37 0.7×	9	295
Nathalie Colombier France	5	84 0.5×	63 0.6×	85 1.4×	20 0.3×	9 0.2×	11	228
Binglin Gong China	7	71 0.4×	61 0.6×	65 1.1×	15 0.3×	35 0.7×	15	187
Nikolaj Harmon Denmark	7	79 0.4×	167 1.7×	86 1.4×	8 0.1×	29 0.6×	11	297
Sera Linardi United States	7	110 0.6×	128 1.3×	73 1.2×	30 0.5×	29 0.6×	20	252
Levent Koçkesen Türkiye	8	160 0.9×	60 0.6×	191 3.1×	126 2.2×	34 0.7×	17	323
Wolfgang J. Luhan United Kingdom	9	125 0.7×	42 0.4×	99 1.6×	35 0.6×	21 0.4×	23	223
Sarah Necker Germany	7	80 0.4×	48 0.5×	83 1.4×	7 0.1×	14 0.3×	19	238
Çağrı S. Kumru Australia	7	82 0.5×	68 0.7×	105 1.7×	22 0.4×	56 1.1×	19	225

Countries citing papers authored by Mana Komai

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mana Komai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mana Komai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mana Komai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mana Komai

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mana Komai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mana Komai. The network helps show where Mana Komai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mana Komai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mana Komai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mana Komai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mana Komai. Mana Komai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Grossman, Philip J., Catherine C. Eckel, Mana Komai, & Wei Zhan. (2019). It pays to be a man: Rewards for leaders in a coordination game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 161. 197–215. 28 indexed citations

2.

Komai, Mana, et al.. (2016). Leadership and the effective choice of information regime. Theory and Decision. 82(1). 117–129. 2 indexed citations

3.

Grossman, Philip J., et al.. (2015). Leadership and gender in groups: An experiment. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique. 48(1). 368–388. 22 indexed citations

4.

Eckel, Catherine C., et al.. (2015). An experimental study of leadership institutions in collective action games. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1(1). 100–113. 43 indexed citations

5.

Kulas, John, Mana Komai, & Philip J. Grossman. (2013). Leadership, information, and risk attitude: A game theoretic approach. The Leadership Quarterly. 24(2). 349–362. 15 indexed citations

6.

Grossman, Philip J., et al.. (2011). Are claims of transparency all they are cracked up to be?. Chan, F., Marinova, D. and Anderssen, R.S. (eds) MODSIM2011, 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation..

7.

Komai, Mana, et al.. (2010). Leadership and information in a single-shot collective action game: An experimental study. Managerial and Decision Economics. n/a–n/a. 13 indexed citations

8.

Komai, Mana & Mark Stegeman. (2010). Leadership based on asymmetric information. The RAND Journal of Economics. 41(1). 35–63. 29 indexed citations

9.

Komai, Mana & Philip J. Grossman. (2009). Leadership and group size: An experiment. Economics Letters. 105(1). 20–22. 16 indexed citations

10.

Komai, Mana, Mark Stegeman, & Benjamin E. Hermalin. (2007). Leadership and Information. American Economic Review. 97(3). 944–947. 75 indexed citations

11.

Komai, Mana & Philip J. Grossman. (2006). Incentivizing Experiments: Monetary Rewards versus Extra Credits. 4 indexed citations

12.

Komai, Mana & Mark Stegeman. (2004). A Theory of Leadership Based on Assignment of Information. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact