Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Developing and Testing an Integrative Model of the Work–Family Interface
19971.1k citationsMichael R. Frone, John K. Yardley et al.Journal of Vocational Behaviorprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by John K. Yardley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John K. Yardley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John K. Yardley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John K. Yardley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John K. Yardley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John K. Yardley. The network helps show where John K. Yardley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John K. Yardley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John K. Yardley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John K. Yardley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John K. Yardley. John K. Yardley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Adamson, Keith, et al.. (2018). Caring for the healthcare professional. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 32(3). 402–415.9 indexed citations
2.
Côté, Jean, John K. Yardley, John Hay, Whitney A. Sedgwick, & Joseph Baker. (2016). An exploratory examination of the coaching behaviour scale for sport. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 5(3). 82–92.23 indexed citations
Baker, Joseph, John K. Yardley, & Jean Côté. (2003). Coach behaviors and athlete satisfaction in team and individual sports.. International journal of sport psychology. 34(3). 226–239.65 indexed citations
Frone, Michael R., John K. Yardley, & Karen S. Markel. (1997). Developing and Testing an Integrative Model of the Work–Family Interface. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 50(2). 145–167.1099 indexed citations breakdown →
Yardley, John K., et al.. (1993). The relationship between work-related attention, motivating potential of jobs, and job effectiveness outcomes.. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 11(3). 37–50.8 indexed citations
Yardley, John K., et al.. (1990). The Economic Impact of a Small, Short-Term Recreation Event on a Local Economy. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 8(4). 71–82.14 indexed citations
13.
Wankel, Leonard M., et al.. (1985). The effects of motivational interventions upon the exercise adherence of high and low self-motivated adults.. PubMed. 10(3). 147–56.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.