John J. Weber

10 papers receiving 78 citations

Peers

John J. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • General Psychology 6
  • Statistics and Probability 24
  • Clinical Psychology 31
  • Music 5
  • Social Psychology 30
Replace Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque with:
Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque Brazil
Carla Cristina Paiva Paracampo Brazil
Michael M. Pitman South Africa
Edward F. Kelly United States
Paul Muyskens United States
Todd A. Gravois United States
Glenda Walsh United Kingdom
Lucy West Australia
Sophia Charitou Greece
Athena A. Drewes United States
John J. Weber relative to Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque Brazil Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Luiz Carlos de Albuquerque · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Weber. The network helps show where John J. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside John J. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Weber Line = papers co-authored together John J. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201620
2 201315
3
Perceived Benefits to Children from Participating in Different Types of Recreational Activities
200813
4
Characteristics of psychoanalytic clinic patients: Report of the Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project: I.
198512
5 197412
6 196711
7 20199
8 19907
9 19745
10 20094
11
Pushing the Boundaries of Education: Evaluating the Impact of Research-Based Social Service Programs with Educational Performance Indicators.
20031
12
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BETTER ENGLISH INSTRUCTION.
19681

About John J. Weber

John J. Weber is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Youth Development and Social Support (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (3 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (6 citations), Statistics and Probability (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (31 citations), Music (5 citations) and Social Psychology (30 citations). John J. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Lesser, Dennis K. Pearl, Lynn Barnett, Jonathan Miller, Henry Bachrach, Stephen A. Haddad, Jack Elinson, Nadia Martin, Michael A. Posner and Jim Albert. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Leisure/Loisir, Psychiatric Quarterly, Journal of Statistics Education and Journal of Park and Recreation Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact