Michael M. Pitman

619 citations
10 papers · 62 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. Pitman

7 papers receiving 54 citations

Peers

Michael M. Pitman
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • General Psychology 5
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17
  • Clinical Psychology 26
  • Applied Psychology 6
  • Statistics and Probability 8
Replace John J. Weber with:
John J. Weber United States
Katia Delrahim Howlett United States
Jiali Dai China
Ryan J. Walker United States
Miguel A. Segura‐Vargas Colombia
Anthony Burry United States
Regina V. Ershova Russia
Cristián Javier Garay Argentina
Jeļena Ļubenko Latvia
Karoline Huth Netherlands
Michael M. Pitman relative to John J. Weber United States John J. Weber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John J. Weber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Pitman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Pitman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Pitman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Pitman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Pitman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Pitman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Pitman. The network helps show where Michael M. Pitman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. Pitman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. Pitman Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. Pitman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 202026
2 200112
3 200711
4 20216
5 20073
6 20133
7 20031
8 20020
9 20230
10 20210

About Michael M. Pitman

Michael M. Pitman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 62 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (5 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (17 citations), Clinical Psychology (26 citations), Applied Psychology (6 citations) and Statistics and Probability (8 citations). Michael M. Pitman has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Linda Richter, Shane A. Norris, Sumaya Laher, Mike Greyling and Zané Lombard. Their work appears in journals such as South African Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Research in Personality, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Musicae Scientiae and South African Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact