Michael M. Pitman

603 total citations
10 papers, 61 citations indexed

About

Michael M. Pitman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael M. Pitman has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 61 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michael M. Pitman's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). Michael M. Pitman is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). Michael M. Pitman collaborates with scholars based in South Africa. Michael M. Pitman's co-authors include Linda Richter, Shane A. Norris, Sumaya Laher, Mike Greyling and Zané Lombard and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Personality, Current Psychology and The International Journal of Psychoanalysis.

In The Last Decade

Michael M. Pitman

7 papers receiving 53 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael M. Pitman South Africa	4	28	17	16	9	8	10	61
John J. Weber United States	8	32 1.1×	5 0.3×	32 2.0×	30 3.3×	24 3.0×	12	109
Sandra McPherson United States	4	15 0.5×	12 0.7×	5 0.3×	5 0.6×	6 0.8×	8	69
Ryan J. Walker United States	7	18 0.6×	28 1.6×	13 0.8×	10 1.1×		11	112
Jeļena Ļubenko Latvia	4	20 0.7×	11 0.6×	21 1.3×	13 1.4×	2 0.3×	8	48
Jiali Dai China	4	54 1.9×	20 1.2×	28 1.8×	14 1.6×		7	112
Anna J. Yeo United States	5	27 1.0×	11 0.6×	6 0.4×	8 0.9×		14	60
Tulio M. Otero United States	3	19 0.7×	27 1.6×	13 0.8×	3 0.3×	12 1.5×	7	77
Solomiia Myroniuk Netherlands	2	24 0.9×	16 0.9×	6 0.4×	7 0.8×		2	38
Regina V. Ershova Russia	4	16 0.6×	18 1.1×	4 0.3×	9 1.0×		21	57
Emma Medlicott United Kingdom	4	41 1.5×	18 1.1×	7 0.4×	22 2.4×		5	61

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Pitman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Pitman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Pitman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Pitman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Pitman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Pitman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Pitman. The network helps show where Michael M. Pitman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael M. Pitman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael M. Pitman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael M. Pitman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael M. Pitman. Michael M. Pitman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Norris, Shane A., et al.. (2023). Early predictors of sensory processing sensitivity in members of the Birth to Twenty Plus cohort. Journal of Research in Personality. 104. 104370–104370.

2.

Pitman, Michael M., et al.. (2021). The association between sensory processing sensitivity, the five-factor model and university adjustment amongst South African university students. Current Psychology. 42(10). 7938–7952. 6 indexed citations

3.

Pitman, Michael M., et al.. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the Involuntary Musical Imagery Scale (IMIS) in a South African sample. Musicae Scientiae. 27(2). 495–509.

4.

Norris, Shane A., et al.. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale in ethnically and culturally heterogeneous South African samples. Current Psychology. 41(7). 4760–4774. 25 indexed citations

5.

Pitman, Michael M.. (2013). Mental states, processes, and conscious intent in Libet's experiments. South African Journal of Philosophy. 32(1). 71–89. 3 indexed citations

6.

Pitman, Michael M., et al.. (2007). Engaging Critical Thinking: Lessons from the RDA Tutorials and Projects. South African Journal of Psychology. 37(2). 375–382. 3 indexed citations

7.

Laher, Sumaya, et al.. (2007). Teaching Research and Statistics at Undergraduate Level: The RDA Tutorial Programme. South African Journal of Psychology. 37(2). 368–374. 11 indexed citations

8.

Pitman, Michael M.. (2003). Eliminative materialism and the integrity of science. South African Journal of Philosophy. 22(3). 207–219. 1 indexed citations

9.

Pitman, Michael M.. (2002). Psychotherapy is Delicate Psychosurgery. South African Journal of Psychology. 32(4). 1–8.

10.

Pitman, Michael M., et al.. (2001). Irreducible subjectivity and interactionism: A critique. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 82(4). 747–765. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact