John C. Trinder

14.6k citations
301 papers · 11.8k · h-index 60

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Trinder

288 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

John C. Trinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 2.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
  • Physiology 3.4k
  • Geology 470
Replace Joost van Hoof with:
Joost van Hoof Netherlands
Mark S. Rea United States
Emmanuel Mignot United States
James Ritchie United States
Christian Cajochen Switzerland
Steven M. Pincus United States
Richard E. Kronauer United States
Antonio Pedotti Italy
Richard J Beare Australia
Carmine Clemente United Kingdom
John C. Trinder relative to Joost van Hoof Netherlands Joost van Hoof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36.2×
Joost van Hoof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Trinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Trinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Trinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Trinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Trinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Trinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Trinder. The network helps show where John C. Trinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Trinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Trinder Line = papers co-authored together John C. Trinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 301 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004424
2 2015344
3 2002275
4 2004257
5 1997239
6 2010190
7 2010186
8 1999180
9 2011176
10 1989160
11 2009151
12 2003149
13 2007147
14 1998146
15 2005144
16 2018141
17 2011137
18 2018134
19 2002131
20 2013129

About John C. Trinder

John C. Trinder is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Environmental Engineering, having authored 301 papers that have together received 11.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (62 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (54 papers), Sleep and related disorders (54 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (45 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (37 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (26 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (23 papers) and Remote-Sensing Image Classification (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (2.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k citations), Physiology (3.4k citations) and Geology (470 citations). John C. Trinder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Brian Allen, Ian M. Colrain, Bei Bei, Christian L. Nicholas, Greg Murray, Amanda Kay, Kurt Kubik, Franz Rottensteiner, Simon Clode and Atul Malhotra. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Journal of Sleep Research, Journal of Applied Physiology, Sleep Medicine and Australian Surveyor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact